Saturday, August 25, 2007

Metals: Supercycle prompts Citigroup to raise copper price forecasts

Base metals equities correction presents 'strong buying opportunity'

CIBC analysts recently forecast that base metals prices will remain high despite the current credit crunch, while the correction of equity prices “represents a strong buying opportunity.”
Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Wednesday , 29 Aug 2007

RENO, NV -

In a recently published industry update, CIBC World Markets suggested that base metals prices should stay high despite current investor fears of slower economic growth.

Meanwhile, CIBC declared that "the recent correction in base metals equity prices represents a strong buying opportunity. With an average pullback of around 30%, most equities are trading at a discount to our long-term NAV estimates."

CIBC analysts Cliff Hale-Sanders and Terry K.H. Tsui said, "The primary question facing investors in the base metals sector is whether the current credit crunch in the U.S. capital markets will result in a lowering of the overall global economy, pushing the metals markets into surplus and re-basing commodity prices."

As problems in the housing and sub-prime mortgage markets have spread, investors are much more fearful of risk, and worry that these issues could result in a modest reduction in global growth rates, which could return commodities to a surplus, bringing the recent bull run to an end, they suggested.

"If metals prices remain robust, as we believe, valuations for base metals equities look very attractive at current levels and we would look to add positions in this environment," Hale-Sanders and Tsui said. "We view this correction as another bump in the road (maybe bigger than one would like) and a buying opportunity."

The analysts noted that the "spectacular bull run in metals prices" has not only been driven by strong base metals fundamentals, "but also by rampant speculation caused by excessive liquidity and leverage within the capital markets as investors tried to take advantage of tight market conditions. With this environment now possibly set to change, there has been a significant unwinding of positions."

Despite the current market turmoil, the analysts said they believed metals prices will remain "well above historical averages until at least 2009 as metals supply growth remains restricted during this period, barring a collapse in demand. Inventories are also expected to remain near historical lows, which should support high metals prices given the potential for ongoing supply disruption."

Nevertheless, CIBC isn't as bullish about "the potential absolute level of metals prices." In the analysts' opinion, "it is hard to envisage a fundamental need for metals prices to move materially higher on an average annual basis to entice new supply."

"If one assumes, as we do, that global demand is positioned to remain positive, albeit at slightly lower growth rates than in previous years, then the global mining industry is likely to continue to struggle to develop new sources of metal supply to catch up to demand despite record-high prices," according to Hale-Sanders and Tsui. "As such, this price cycle appears to have more legs than previous cycles."

CIBC asserts that the mining industry "is well behind in terms of adding new supply and, therefore, we are unlikely to see the traditional boom-and-bust price cycle in the mining sector. ...This, of course, assumes demand remains strong. If demand levels wane, new supply may not be required."

Current metals prices are providing mining companies "significant and abnormally high profit margins from which to grow their businesses and prices remain more than high enough to act as an incentive for new entrants," CIBC noted.

"While it is next to impossible to say if prices have already peaked or are just pausing on their long-term uptrend," the analysts said, "we are confident that prices are set to remain well above historic averages and should result in a sustained period of profitability for the mining sector."

"This period of sustained robust cash flows, combined with low multiples being ascribed to the sector, leads us to believe the stocks are positioned to be re-rated in the market in the next 12 to 24 months."

"In summary, we view the outlook for metals demand as remaining health for the next several years, barring a global recession, which would curtail demand and, in doing so, impact supply-side constraints," the analysts concluded.

So far unscathed, are commodities next to fall?

Globe and Mail Update

A funny thing has happened on the way out of risky, volatile, speculative investments. Commodities have gotten off virtually unscathed. So far.

The benchmark for global commodity performance, the Reuters/Jefferies-CRB Index, closed at 320.18 yesterday, down a modest 1.8 per cent from its recent highs of two weeks ago, which coincided with the peaks in the equity markets. It is actually up almost 1 per cent since the equity selloff began in earnest last week.

Commodities are benefiting from the fact that the financial market tumult has not, to date, been an economic story. The economic fundamentals underpinning demand for raw materials and fuels remain relatively solid, especially outside the United States, while supplies of many commodities remain tight. That continues to lend support to commodity prices even as financial markets attempt to adjust for a non-economic threat, namely growing credit risks.

"Fundamentals do matter. It's really that simple," said Bart Melek, global commodity strategist at BMO Nesbitt Burns.

Of course, those credit risks do have the potential to spread to the broader economy, slowing spending and demand in a wide range of areas. But while equity investors seem nervous about such a possibility, commodity traders, it would seem, are a more confident breed.

Front and centre among those bold commodity players are the speculators - in other words, the hedge funds. That's right, the same hedge funds that are being severely rattled by the prospect of tightening credit conditions, since much of their investing binge in the past few years has been financed with low-cost debt.

The hedge fund speculators had been piling back into commodities in the past few weeks, according to commodity futures market data from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Speculative long positions in oil and copper were at record highs last week, while gold speculative longs had risen to two-month highs.

Have the credit-risk-fuelled market jitters changed that? We'll get a much better idea today, when the CFTC releases fresh weekly data on traders' long and short positions. Analysts believe the hedgies have begun unwinding some of their bloated speculative long positions, but so far they have been selective and measured, going after commodities where they can liquidate the easiest and realize the best profits.

That may be why gold, for example, retreated almost $25 (U.S.) last week. Copper has also been in retreat, not surprising given that the yen carry trade - a key pillar in the global liquidity flood that markets fear is beginning to dry up - has been a major financing tool for speculative purchases of copper and other base metals.

There could be a lot more downside where that came from. Richard Bernstein, chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch in New York, estimates that speculation accounts for more than 30 per cent of the current price built into market-traded commodities. If the credit crunch deepens, and heavily leveraged hedge-fund speculators are forced to liquidate assets to meet their obligations and financing needs, that's a lot of fat that could melt away from commodities.

"Short-term investors in other overvalued speculative assets, like commodities and emerging markets, should learn from the current mishaps in the debt markets. Supposedly liquid securities can rapidly become illiquid," Mr. Bernstein warned in a note to clients this week.

Martin King, oil commodity analyst at FirstEnergy Capital Corp. in Calgary, said oil could be in for an unwinding of speculative long positions anyway, in the wake of a sharp runup in fund buying since the end of May. He said crude prices could easily pull back $10 (U.S.) a barrel in the next two months on "normal seasonal unwinding." He suggested that additional selling linked to the credit market fears might deepen that correction to $15.

Which is not to say that the bull market for commodities is on its deathbed; the fundamentals are too strong for that. Still, a deepening credit crunch could well spell the end to the rampant speculation in commodities that has proven so profitable for hedge funds and, indeed, the broader investment community.

"True long-term investors should continue restructuring portfolios to accentuate undervalued higher-quality assets at the expense of speculative lower-quality assets," Mr. Bernstein said. "The liquidity driven, speculative tone to the financial markets the past five years is unlikely to be the tone of the next five years."



FREEPORT, BARRICK, NEWMONT WILL BENEFIT

Citigroup analysts on two continents hiked copper price forecasts Monday, asserting that “nowhere are the drivers and determinants of the commodity supercycle more clearly on display than in copper.”

Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Tuesday , 24 Jul 2007

RENO, NV -

Highlighting a "super cycle shining on copper," Citigroup Global Markets metals analysts Monday revised their copper forecasts up to $3.50/lb in 2008 and $3/lb in 2009/2010.

The long-term copper price assumption was increased by 32% to $1.45/lb.

Based on their Australian counterparts' recent in-depth analyst of the copper supercycle released Monday, Citigroup metals analysts John H. Hill and Graham Wark of San Francisco and Sydney's Alan Heap hiked the target price for copper-gold producer Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) to $120/sh. The analysts also raised EPS estimates for mega-gold miners Barrick (AFX) and Newmont (NEM), based in large part on their copper operations.

In their report, "Copper-A Super Cycle Sheen," Citigroup Sydney, Australia-based Research Analysts Heap and Alex Tonks proposed that "the copper market is enjoying a repeat of its performance in the supercycles of 50 and 100 years ago. Demand is strong and supply is struggling to keep up. Structural change is underway in consequence."

The analysts defined a commodity super cycle as an extended period (10-plus years) of trend rise in price, "driven by a major economy as it urbanizes and industrializes." During the past 150 years, Citigroup indicated that there have been two previous commodity super cycles.

"We believe three factors will support high long-run returns: strong demand growth; a steep cost curve; and high barriers to entry," Heap and Tonks declared. "There is no shortage of large copper deposits, but they tend to be in regions of high political risk, and are low grade, thus increasing barriers to entry."

Citigroup asserts that the copper market will be close to supply demand balance until 2010. Meanwhile, they also forecast that copper prices will soften in the second half of this year "as the end of restocking by Chinese fabricators impacts the market, and strike concerns abate."

Nevertheless, the analysts also suggested that a steeper cost curve to produce copper, increasing barriers to entry and strong demand growth "will support higher returns in the future." In the meantime, sustainable high copper prices "can be expected to attract new market entrants," they advised. "The Chinese are the most notable, driven by strong domestic demand, a shortage of domestic resources and a smelter industry which is short of supply."

SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE

Nonetheless, Citigroup's analysis suggested that the intensity of Chinese copper use may be peaking. "High production composition of income (i.e. an economy driven by manufacturing and exports, rather than the consumer and services) in China is the driver of the super cycle," the analysts put forward. "However, material composition of product is lower now: less copper is used in many applications than in the past. ...In China electricity intensity may be reaching a higher plateau."

Heap and Tonks advocated that "lower than expected supply has been the most important factor supporting [copper] prices above forecast levels. It remains a key uncertainty, both in the short and long term. Short term concerns center on the impacts of possible strikes. Long term issues center on the timing of new supply."

"We now expect persistent tightness in the copper market through 2009," the analysts advised. "From 2010 the market moves into surplus as supply increases to meet continuing strong demand growth. The smelter bottleneck also eases, allowing smelter utilization rates to recover."

"Our central forecast points to an excess in mine supply from 2012. In the forecast this is reflected in a build up of concentrate stocks, as there is unlikely to be sufficient smelter capacity to process the concentrate. If sufficient smelter capacity does become available surpluses would be expected to build in the metal market."

A higher proportion of new copper supply is expected to come from high political risk regions, including Central Africa, which Citigroup advises will add at least 10% of new supply "and potentially much more." Despite the risk, "large mining companies are increasingly comfortable operating in such regions however, relying on technology and surveillance to ensure the safety of personnel," the analysts indicated.

Citigroup advises that Chile will continue to dominate copper mine supply, but that Central Africa "is potentially a center of much greater future growth."

Citigroup was adamant in its assertion that "there is no shortage of large copper deposits," citing a recent Brook Hunt study identifying more than 100 projects with measured and indicated resources of more then 200Mt of copper at 0.68% Cu, equating to 25 years of supply. Of the 100 projects, 30 have more than 2Mt contained copper.

In its analysis, Citigroup projected costs forward to 2014, forecasting that the industry average cash cost of production will be 80-cents per pound.

Citigroup also forecasts "extreme tightness in the concentrate market continuing until the next decade as a consequence of modest growth in concentrate supply and increasing smelter capacity. TC/RCs will remain under pressure. ...Looking further forward, the market will ease after 2010 as concentrate supply increases, and assuming no new smelters are built beyond those already committed."

The analysts proposed that two critical issues will shape the copper demand outlook in the short and medium term: the Chinese inventory cycle and the U.S. economy." They suggested that U.S. demand may be bottoming even though housing is in a downturn and auto sector demand is also weak.

"Overall our demand forecast is for growth to average 5.1% year until 2010," Citigroup said.

U.S.-based Citigroup analysts Hill and Wark said, "We are re-setting copper forecasts significantly higher across the board to levels broadly in-line with the future curve and well above forecasts embedded in consensus earnings for the mining companies. "

"It is becoming clear to us that the legacy of a decade of under-advancement, frictional barriers to new capacity, and voracious demand in both developing and established economies have overwhelmed supply, while frustrating prophesies of imminent cycle surplus," they declared.

"We expect copper supply/demand to remain very tight and see little chance that inventories can be meaningfully rebuilt before 2010," they wrote. "Fundamental drives we point to include: 1) A higher/steeper cost curve; 2) Resource nationalism restricting access; 3) Increasing difficulty in permitting; 4) Shortages of equipment and technical staff; and 5) Falling ore grades and resource depletion."

Despite the declining Chinese intensity cited by their Australian counterparts, Hill and Wark advised that they expect Chinese demand will average 12% per year, and global trend growth will increase from 2.5% to 4.5%."

COPPER FORECASTS BENEFIT GOLD MINERS

Citigroup's analysis suggests that high copper price forecasts benefit gold mines, such as Barrick and Newmont, "who each have significant exposure. We continue to be ardent believers in gold, based on a mix of supply/demand and macro/monetary drivers. ...Our sense is that as investors query, ‘What's big, important, and profitable in metals, and where the shares haven't run?', the answer will be ‘gold.'"

Noting that the Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold model is "heavily leveraged to copper" and commodity forecasts above $3/lb have had profound effects, the analysts said, "We are raising EPS estimates by 80-100% in 2008/09." Citigroup lowered target multiples for the New Orleans based mega-miner, but are taking the FCX target to $120/share.

Meanwhile, the analysts suggested that the "aggressive valuation and commodity framework employed by Rio Tinto in its friendly bid for Alcan, casts Freeport in a favorable light. This is particularly true from the margin and relative resources scarcity perspective. While it seems premature for Freeport to be ‘back in play,' there might eventually be a good fit with CVRD or others."

Citigroup also hiked its EPS estimate for Barrick, particularly highlighting the "unsung yet highly profitable" Zaldivar copper mine in China. "With the global re-rating of the hard rock miners, Barrick's non-gold assets are increasingly attractive," the analysts said. "Also, gold has shrugged off the central bank sales and assorted pessimists, to regain the $670/oz level, while gold equity multiple compression appears to have run its course."

Finally, Citigroup also slightly raised EPS estimates on Newmont to reflect the impact of higher copper prices at the Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia. "This is offset by expectations for a flower ramp-up at the ‘new' Phoenix mine in NV. Material cashflows are unlikely before the PRB-fired power plant can supply cheaper electricity (-50%) in mid-2008."


Base Metals 2007 - Learning to live with volatility

Even such a short period as the past quarter has seen some remarkable changes in base metals prices – both up and down.

Author: Natixis Commodity Markets
Posted: Wednesday , 01 Aug 2007

LONDON -

Since Natixis Commodity Markets' previous quarterly report, there have been some incredible changes in base metal prices. No common theme really emerged in this period and the performance of nickel and lead stand out. The nickel price in late July is around 35% below the all-time high of $54,200/tonne set on May 16, while lead prices are now 120% above the low for the year. Supply disruptions have been the key driver behind lead's amazing performance so far this year. Lower supply and increased investment fund activity have also supported tin's recent advance, and the rebound in copper prices. Zinc prices have come under pressure despite LME inventories continuing to trend lower, while the aluminium market remains well supplied and prices have traded in a narrow range.

Global base metals demand remains "out of sync"

The de-synchronisation of the demand cycle has been a feature of the metals market for sometime. It is a positive feature, as we are not seeing the sharp reductions in global demand as consumption dips temporarily in many of the key consuming regions. For example, so far in 2007, the markets have generally taken in their stride the weakness in US demand, as consumption has been strong in Europe. This de-synchronisation of demand within Japan, North America and Europe is also taking place against the background of robust metals-intensive growth in China and India - a trend that certainly looks set to continue.

Substitution - mainly an issue for the nickel market

The lack of detailed end-use data for the base metals markets means it is difficult to quantify some of the substitution pressures. For most of the base metals, substitution has not been a major factor, with the exception of nickel, and to a lesser extent, copper. For nickel, the massive increase in prices is passed on directly - through the alloy surcharge system - to the consumer of stainless steel. As we have noted in our earlier reports, nickel's use by the stainless steel industry is being affected in two ways - the greater level of ferritic production (which contains no nickel), and in the emerging markets higher 200 series (which contains less nickel than the 300 series).

The alloy surcharge system also adds to the volatility in orders for stainless. Following the recent sharp correction in the nickel prices, alloy surcharges will fall dramatically. Therefore consumers and service centres are reluctant to place orders in the knowledge that stainless prices are falling.

Substitution in the copper market has been focused on plumbing, heat exchanger and wiring applications. For zinc, pressures have emerged in the brass and die-casting sectors, while aluminium has probably benefited from substitution at the expense of copper and tinplate.

Supply tightness is still a feature for most of the base metals

The supply side has been a key factor behind the bull market. The combination of structural tightness due to low levels of investment earlier in the decade, technical problems associated with high utilisation rates and increased labour disputes, have all constrained supply. The low level of treatment charges for lead and copper suggest that supply tightness is still an issue. For most of the metals, the pipeline of new projects is not that threatening in terms of additional supply. Zinc is at the other extreme, as a supply response to the period of high prices is starting to emerge.

Buffer stocks remain low

The recent trends in the lead market highlight the low level of buffer stocks. All the markets are still vulnerable to unexpected supply losses (or sudden surges in demand). The supply disruptions in Australia and lower exports from China quickly filtered through to the lead market, while strikes continue to support the copper price.

The economic environment is favourable for this stage of the price cycle

Typically high commodity prices are associated with extreme inflationary pressures, rising interest rates and the potential for a sharp contraction in the level of economic activity. Natixis Commodity Markets believes that the economic climate is exceptionally benign.

Aluminium

Aluminium prices have been remarkably stable in recent months. There is nothing in the current fundamentals to suggest that prices should move drastically away from their current range (either to the upside or the downside) in the summer months. Natixis Commodity Markets project a relatively balanced market this year, compared to last year's 357,000 tonne deficit, we predict 50,000 tonnes for 2007. However, given the strength in non-Western World consumption, we forecast the deficit increasing once more in 2008 to 250,000 tonnes.

The main bullish argument appears to be that the metals' underperformance could attract fund interest. However more likely in our view is for prices to drift lower due to seasonal factors. With inventories unlikely to approach the critical levels seen elsewhere in the sector, Natixis Commodity Markets projects an average annual price average of $2,750/tonne for 2007, dropping to $2,300/tonne in 2008.

Copper

A number of different and conflicting themes are affecting the copper market. Essentially they can be summarised as the demand side being weak and the supply side being bullish. Since April, these factors largely cancelled each other out with monthly average prices remaining in a $7,475-8,000/tonne range. The supply tightness is partly a function of strikes, but also due to a shortfall in concentrate output (reflected by low TCs). While the former may be temporary, the latter will take some time to work through the system.

Demand conditions have been weak all year in the US, while in China demand (imports of cathode) has eased reflecting the over-buying earlier in the year. Consumption is weakening in Europe but that is mainly for seasonal reasons. We believe demand will pick up but that it will be matched by higher supply. Given strike action we have raised our 2007 price forecast to $6,750/tonne from our earlier estimate of $6,350/tonne. In line with this we have also raised our 2008 forecast price to $5,750/tonne from $5,000 in our previous report. In terms of the supply-demand balance, we project a 50,000 tonne surplus in 2007 moving to a 160,000 tonne surplus in 2008.

Lead

The lead market has tightened considerably since our previous report as the production problems at the concentrate stage begin to bite. More recently the market appears to being supported by the imposition of an export tax by the Chinese government. Despite the amazing surge in lead prices, Natixis Commodity Markets has only made slight changes to the supply-demand balance. We have scaled back our estimates of Western World refined output due to the tight concentrate position. We have also reduced our projections of refined net exports from China. Lower supply is partially offset by weaker than expected consumption. The bottom line is that we are forecasting a 60,000 tonne deficit compared to our previous estimate of a 35,000 tonne shortfall. For 2008 we still have the lead market in a modest surplus.

We have, however, significantly raised our prices. Natixis Commodity Markets is now forecasting an average lead cash price of $2,400/tonne. We still view a lead cash price of over $3,000/tonne as ultimately unsustainable and project an average cash price of $1,900/tonne in 2008.

Nickel

We forecast a marginal surplus of 5,000 tonnes, on the back of a 0.9% rise in Western World usage counterbalanced by a 5.0% rise in supply. For 2008, we see this surplus expanding slightly to 15,000 tonnes with supply growth at 4.7% compared to 4.0% for demand. The increase in LME inventories so far in 2007 (in volume terms) has been quite small given the cuts in stainless output and the greater availability of scrap. This raises the question of whether off warrant stocks have been built up. From a fundamental standpoint, this suggests scope for further price weakness. As such, Natixis Commodity Markets projects an average annual price of $37,000/tonne in 2007, which should then fall to $27,000/tonne in 2008.

Tin

On the basis of lower than expected demand growth we have amended our supply-demand balance analysis to show a 2,000 tonne deficit compared to our previous estimate of an 18,000 tonne shortfall. LME stocks in late July, at around 13,000 tonnes, are largely unchanged from the beginning of the year. LME stocks dipped in the early part of the year when the disruption to Indonesian output was at its most extreme. Since then they have increased by around 5,000 tonnes. We expect that the increase in stocks will level off in the latter part of the year as demand starts to pick up after a relatively weak start to the year. In 2008, the market is forecast to show a slight surplus of 8,000 tonnes. This should lead to an average annual price of $11,000/tonne in 2008 compared to this year's projected outturn of $13,750/tonne.

Zinc

In the short-term there is the potential for zinc prices to rally in response to the on-going reduction in LME inventories. However, we would view such a move as temporary, with two key features during the remainder of the year likely to help bring prices lower. These will be an increase to Chinese exports of refined zinc and a sharp rise in mine production globally. For 2007 we project a price average of $3,500/tonne, and $2,900/tonne in 2008 as the market moves into a surplus of 125,000 tonnes next year.


Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Freeport McMoran FCX

S&P gives Freeport-McMoRan ‘positive’ credit rating, despite $9.7b debt

S&P has revised the outlook for Freeport-McMoRan upward, noting robust commodity prices, vast reserves, diversified production, and a good project pipeline will reduce corporate debt by $1.8 billion this year.

Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Wednesday , 18 Jul 2007

RENO, NV -

Citing expectations that Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold will be able to reduce its $9.7 billion debt, Standard & Poor's this week revised its outlook for Freeport and its Phelps Dodge acquisition from "stable" to "positive," affirming all corporate credit ratings.

Primary Credit Analyst Thomas Watters said, "The outlook revision reflects our expectations that Freeport-McMoRan should also be able to reduce its borrowing, specifically the $2.45 billion under its term loan A facility, in a reasonable time frame to warrant an upgrade of the corporate credit rating to investment grade."

"The ratings on Freeport reflect its leading position in copper mining, its significant and diverse reserve base, its very-low cost Indonesian operations, strong liquidity, and currently favorable metals prices," Watters wrote. "The ratings also reflect very aggressive debt leverage, exposure to cyclical and volatile commodity prices, rising costs, challenges faced at its mature, U.S.-based operations, and exposure to the political and sovereign risks of Indonesia."

Watters noted that Freeport should benefits from Phelps Dodge's "good production pipeline potential-specifically, the low-cost Tenke Fungurame project in the Congo, which, is however, exposed to that country's political risk." Nevertheless, he also expressed some discomfort at Freeport's exposure to Indonesia's operating risks through its gigantic Grasberg copper-gold operation, accounting for 38% of Freeport's revenues, 35% of equity production, and 40% of pro forma EBITDA.

"Moreover, while we deem Phelps to be a very good mining operator, " Watters said, "Phelps' U.S. based-operations are mature and relatively high-cost compared to other mining operations, This is primarily of lower ore grades and exposure to U.S. labor, environmental compliance, and energy costs, which are higher than for international mining operations. The company has relied on strict adherence to reducing costs throughout its system while advancing new, lower-cost, and more efficient mining techniques."

While S&P feels Freeport's credit metrics are healthy, they also asserted that it reflects "peak copper, gold, and molybdenum prices and does not indicate our expectations for credit metrics in the future. Despite the considerable paydown of debt, we view the capital structure as aggressive. Nevertheless, Freeport should achieve a more conservative balance sheet based on our outlook for copper, gold and molybdenum prices for the next four to five quarters."

S&P forecast that Freeport will generate a discretionary cash flow of $1.8 billion this year, thanks to robust commodity markets, which will reduce overall debt to $7 billion-$7.2 billion.



In a presentation to the JPMorgan Basics & Industrial Conference Monday, Freeport President and CEO Richard Adkerson said the company expects to have operating cash flows of $5.3 billion this year and year-end total debt of $9 billion. Its mines will produce 3.9 billion pounds of copper, 1.9 million ounces of gold, and 70 million pounds of molybdenum this year, according to Adkerson.

Freeport's PD division is developing the $650 million Tenke Fungurume copper/cobalt project in the DRC, which is anticipated to yield 259 million pounds of copper and 18 million pounds of cobalt in its first decade. Adkerson also gave a project update for the DOZ Expansions in Indonesia including mine development activities at the Grasberg Block Cave during the second half of this year.



Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold tripled its Q2 net earnings from a year ago on higher metal prices and the $26 billion buyout of copper miner Phelps Dodge, but EPS of $2.62 fell short of the $2.74 analysts were forecasting. FCX 25 07 2007 EarningsChartNet income rose over 200% to $1.1 billion, while revenue climbed 307% to $5.33 billion. "Our second-quarter financial performance reflects strong results in our North American, South American and Indonesian operations, and a continuation of positive market conditions for copper, gold and molybdenum. The outlook for our business is strong," the company said in its press release. Shares are up 70.5% YTD in apparent appreciation of the acquisition, which made FCX the world's number-two copper company. In a July 6 note, Credit Suisse wrote, "Comparing FCX’s copper, molybdenum, and gold reserves with current North American equity market valuations for the reserves of ‘pure play’ copper, molybdenum, and gold producers suggests FCX shares ($95) are worth $126 per share." Shares are trading slightly higher in the pre-market. Check for Freeport-McMoRan's earnings call transcript later today.



James Cullen submits: Freeport McMoRan: Cheap Producer, Cheap Stock I recently completed my research into Freeport McMoRan (FCX), which acquired Phelps Dodge to become the largest publicly traded copper company in the world. There is much to be interested in here, as the new Freeport now has geographic diversity, excellent reserves, additional promising projects, and exposure to molybdenum.

Here are a few main points to consider:

  • The Freeport/Phelps Dodge combo trades at a trailing pro forma 4.6x EV/EBITDA. Compare this with other major miners like Southern Copper (PCU) at 6.8x EV/EBITDA, Rio Tinto (RTP) at 7.4x EV/EBITDA, Barrick Gold (ABX) at 10.6 EV/EBITDA, and Newmont Mining (NEM) at 10x EV/EBITDA.
  • Copper market fundamentals remain positive for Freeport, as supply and demand remain in a very tight balance. Further, a lack of major capacity additions coupled with continued growing demand from China and an eventual uptick in housing starts in America will further add to the demand side. The potential for supply disruptions – as seen with Southern Copper’s miners going on strike in Peru last week – remains a very real threat, as warehouse supplies of copper are also near record lows.
  • Much of the additional supply that is seen coming to the copper markets in the next few years will be sourced from Freeport’s mines; this should give the company better control over industry-wide production practices, and hence price. With the majority of mines in the latter stages of life and estimated to be depleted by 2021, Freeport is in excellent positioning with its reserve quality and life, as its projects will have a great role in swaying global supply.
  • This might sound a bit scary, but Freeport does not hedge its production. The company is levered to copper prices, with each $0.10 change in copper resulting in a change of $250M in Operating Cash Flow or $0.75 in EPS. Gold and molybdenum prices both have an impact, although to a much lesser extent. Freeport’s management has a great degree of experience and a reputation for being the lowest cost producer, and their stance on hedging is obviously indicative of a belief that copper prices won’t significantly retreat any time soon. At current prices, Freeport should be able to generate well over $6 billion in Operating Cash Flow.
  • Using a quick cash flow valuation, I believe FCX is worth north of $85/share. While there might be some uncertainty surrounding this stock given that the latest quarter only including marginal production from Phelps Dodge, I think that next quarter’s fully integrated results will handily beat expectations and send the stock much higher, but make sure to watch the cash, as the accrual results are going to be impacted by accounting items from the deal.
  • Tuesday, August 21, 2007

    Southern Copper (PCU) and Lundin Mining (LMC)

    Southern Copper Corp (PCU) is the fourth largest copper producer in the world and a leading producer of zinc, silver, and molybdenum. SCC's conducts mining and smelting operations are in Mexico and Peru with exploration activities conducted in Mexico, Peru, and Chile. SCC is the largest miner in both Mexico and Peru. Grupo Mexico (GMBXF.PK) is the largest shareholder with a controlling shareholder of 75.1% stake.

    Normally, most investors will shy away from a foreign major holding a majority stake as there is a risk of transfer pricing or dilution which would destroy shareholder value. But from the moment Grupo Mexico raised its stake through an asset injection it has acted like a kind parent. The main risk is actually a benefit to minority shareholders. Grupo Mexico plans on moving the excess cash flow up to the parent company through quarterly dividends which gives the stock a dividend yield of approximately 7%, far above other mining stocks and an excellent play on rising copper prices.

    The Mexican operations consist of 8 mines utilizing open pit and underground operations with two smelters. The primary mine, the Cananea Unit is the longest operating mine with operations tracing back to 1899. Unlike most mines where the ore grade declines as the mine goes deeper, the grades at Cananea have remained consistent.

    In Peru, SCC operates 2 open pit mines at Cuajone and Toquepala on the western slopes of Cordillera Occidental, the southern Andes Mountains of Peru. Recent upgrades to the concentrators and smelter at Ilo allow for better recoveries within the production process.

    SCC is currently exploring a number of deposits throughout Peru and Chile and has identified a number of targets for drilling and further exploration. The Los Chancas project in Peru is currently in pre-feasibility stage with drilling results returning a mineral deposit of 200 tons grading 1% copper, 0.07% molybdenum, and 0.12 grams of gold per ton.

    In Mexico, SCC has three significant projects, El Arco, Buenavista, and Angangueo. El Arco preliminary investigations indicate a deposit with 846 million tons of sulfide ore with initial grading of 0.51% copper and 0.14 grams of gold per ton. Angangueo's drilling identified 13 million tons of ore with a reserve estimate of 0.16 grams of gold and 262 grams of silver per ton along with 3.5% zinc, 0.79% lead, and 0.97% copper. The Buenavista project projects a reserve of 36 million tons of ore with grades of 3.3% zinc, 0.69% copper, and 29 grams of silver per ton in an area adjacent to the Cananea ore body.

    During 2006 SCC developed projects in Peru related to crop planting, cattle raising irrigation, and water resource management to assist the local communities in building basic industry that does not revolve around mining to assist in the eventual transition to self-sufficiency when the mines life ends.

    In Mexico, SCC works with the local communities on a wide range of educational, environmental, and social issues.

    SCC's social responsibilities to their communities revolve around supporting cultural and religious expression, educational programs, rural and urban communities, the governments and company's health care initiatives, and encouraging production chains in the communities where the company operates.

    Recent elections in both Peru and Mexico have placed left leaning politicians in power but political risk is expected to be minimized as both governments realize the benefits the mining industry provides in a number of areas. In Peru, the government has learned from previous mistakes and wants to continue the economic revival going on in the country. The Peruvian stock market has one of the best returns in the world over the past one and three year timeframes with citizens becoming more and more confident over the countries future.

    The biggest risk comes in the form of lawsuits between AMC and Grupo Mexico involving a transfer of assets from Asarco to SCC. SCC has not been formally named in the legal proceedings but in the course of various legal proceedings it may be enjoined depending on the various rulings.

    For the first quarter of 2007, net sales increased by more than 20% on the back of stronger metals prices and increased production. Cost of sales rose by almost 15% and the EDITA margin expanded to 64.6%. Earnings per share were up by 33% over the year earlier period and a dividend of $1.50 per share was announced.

    Southern Copper Corp. is an excellent play on rising copper prices with an attractive dividend yield for investors. Exploration in Peru and Mexico has identified attractive deposits which should offset any decline in ore grades from currently operating mines.

    Source: Southern Copper Corp. website, 10-K, and 10-Q filings.



    Lundin Mining

    Lundin Mining Looks for New Targets After Two Big Takeovers so far This Year

    By Craig Wong
    14 Aug 2007 at 04:34 PM GMT-04:00

    VANCOUVER (CP) -- With one major takeover behind it this year and another nearly completed, Lundin Mining Corp. [AMEX:LMC; TSX:LUN] is pursuing a twin strategy to grow its existing projects and pursue more acquisitions, the company's CEO said Tuesday.

    “We are strong believers that the strong metal markets will continue not only for this year, but also for a couple of years to come,” Karl-Axel Waplan told a conference call with analysts.

    “What we see is that the stocks in respect to zinc, lead and copper are extremely low. The price has been a bit volatile during the first six months of this year, but it is on a very high level if one looks historically.”

    Lundin reported record earnings during the second quarter, due to solid operating performance and higher metal prices.

    The Vancouver-based international miner earned $159.9 million or 56 cents per share during the three months ended June 30, up from $37.2 million or 30 cents per share a year ago. Quarterly revenue grew to $319.9 million from $112.9 million.

    The average analyst estimate according to Thomson Financial had been for earnings of 59 cents per share based on four analysts.

    Lundin shares were down 27 cents at $12.32 on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

    The company completed its friendly C$1.4-billion takeover of Tenke Mining Corp. [TSX:TNK] on July 3, gaining a stake in a copper and cobalt development in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    Lundin also expects to wrap up its C$925-million acquisition of Rio Narcea Gold Mines Ltd. [AMEX:RNO; TSX:RNG] later this month after enriching its initial bid.

    Waplan said Lundin had acquired 91% the Rio Narcea shares under its offer and was going ahead with a mandatory offer for the remaining stake in the company.

    Waplan has said he would like to do at least one more deal this year.

    Lundin has four operating mines including Neves-Corvo in Portugal, the Zinkgruvan and Storliden mines in Sweden, and the Galmoy mine in Ireland.

    A fifth mine, Aljustrel in Portugal, is under construction and the acquisition of Spanish nickel-copper mine Aguablanca during the third quarter will add to copper production and provide nickel.

    Production at Aljustrel is taking longer than expected due to the late delivery of processing equipment, and will not begin until late in the year rather than in September as previously planned.

    The company also faces some uncertainty at Galmoy where negotiations with unions continue

    Rio Narcea Reports Soaring Net Earnings

    Rio Narcea Gold Mines Ltd. said Tuesday its second-quarter net earnings are nearly triple those of the same period last year.

    The company said it netted $16.2 million during this year's second quarter, up from $5.6 during the April-June period a year ago.

    Revenues were $50.1 million, down from last year's $53.29 million.


    By Carole Vaporean

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - Lundin Mining Corp. (LMC) takes a bullish view of base metals prices and sees nickel as the star performer amid delays in new supply and rising global demand, its vice chairman said on Wednesday.

    "My view is that it's being driven by the impact of China, supported by increasing demand in India, Brazil and the emerging nations," Colin Benner told the Reuters Global Mining and Steel Summit.

    Speaking by phone from Lundin headquarters in Vancouver, Benner said he thinks nickel, copper and zinc are in a long-term bullish cycle, driven by strong industrial and consumer demand, especially in emerging markets.

    "There's just not enough product out there to satisfy their needs," he said. "I'd suggest that will keep prices buoyant for some time to come."

    Judging by thin inventories, Benner said he thinks nickel, used primarily in stainless steel, will be the star.

    Lundin is making its foray into the metal with the planned acquisition of Rio Narcea Gold Mines Ltd.

    "We're doing it cautiously," he said. "We're moving into sulphites and we suspect that we'll stay in that space for awhile."

    Large laterite deposits, developed to fill robust demand for nickel, did not ramp up as rapidly as projected. A resulting shortfall in the raw material began starving smelters, Benner said.

    "It's a bit of a phenomenon. Everyone is building. Everyone is growing," he said. "As a consequence, I think nickel will be stronger for longer than copper and zinc."

    On Wednesday, nickel slid on the London Metal Exchange, along with the rest of the base metals complex, to close at $46,350 per tonne. Since early January, however, it has surged beyond anyone's forecast from a 2007 low at $30,100 a tonne.

    Zinc is up about 18 percent and copper up 16 percent since the first quarter.

    COPPER AND ZINC 'HUGE'

    Benner called demand for both copper and zinc "huge," but he said zinc prices should gain more than copper this year and into early next year with less new zinc production expected. He sees copper stabilizing near current levels.

    "I believe we're still in that metals super-cycle, but you'll see ups and downs along that super-cycle curve," Benner said.

    Lundin's own order books are filled, he said, adding that 80 percent of copper output at its Neves-Corvo mine in Portugal is already committed to smelters, and the company has no trouble filling the rest.

    Lundin's strategic plan calls for internal growth at its operations in Portugal, Sweden and Spain; a strong technical team of geologists in Vancouver to assist junior miners in the exploration field; and a search for acquisitions of base metal mining operations that can add to earnings.

    "I think there will be some opportunities out there," he said. "We've already targeted a few. I can't mention them, but we're looking hard at them. We're looking all over the world."

    Benner also said the company has not taken precautions to fend off potential suitors. At the same time, he said: "We're not going around with a 'for sale' sign. We have a long-term perspective on the growth of this company."

    He pointed to the company's purchase of a 24.75 percent stake in Tenke Mining Corp. in the Democratic Congo as part of its long-term strategy.

    The Tenke deal should be complete on June 18 when shareholders take a vote at Lundin's annual meeting.

    Lundin also expects Aljustrel in Portugal to come online in September, fed initially by lower-grade ore producing 1.4 million tonnes per year into 2008, then upgrading its ore by September 2008 for mill throughput of 1.8 million tonnes.

    He added that Lundin was able to extend output at its Storliden copper and zinc mine in Sweden to the fourth quarter from its previous closing date in the third quarter.




    Monday, August 20, 2007

    Northern Dynasty Minerals (NAK)

    Northern Dynasty shares fall 14 per cent after Pebble partnership news

    Peter Grandich:
    The announcement of a “true” 50/50 partnership with Anglo American (AA) has set the stage
    for the target I’ve had for the share price since the stock was around $5. I do
    believe in my heart of hearts that $25 is not only legitimate, but it may now
    be only the half-way point if NDM gets to remain independent for the next
    12-24 months.
    Before I share why I believe this, let me once again note two important factors:
    1 - I still have most of my NDM shares. The only ones I sold were so I
    could buy a big position in Formation Capital (FCO-TSE) (a client of Grandich
    Publications).
    2- The Hunter-Dickinson Group is the finest group of people in the mining
    and exploration business today – bar none. I know much of what they have
    done for NDM shareholders and I will stand in front of the world and shout
    how much they care for all shareholders (and don’t forget that they own 13%
    of the shares).

    Okay, why do I believe the best is yet to come?
    Up until this deal, one could still have in the back of their mind major concerns
    about the ability to move this project forward. Like any mammoth project,
    NDM was facing lots of hurdles and getting there alone would have been a
    challenge even HD could have struggled with. So a major coming in was, if
    you will, a necessary evil. But here’s where I’m so honored to know HD
    management: HD made an unprecedented joint venture (JV) deal!!!
    Unlike most JV’s, the major (AA) didn’t end up taking control. AA and NDM
    are truly 50/50 in all aspects. AA is not the Operator, Pebble Mines Corp.
    is, and each will control 50% of it. AA receives no management fees and
    no priority paybacks! All cash distributions/earnings are 50/50 from
    day one. NDM is literally financed to production! It’s also unique and
    benefitting to HD in that AA must spend the entire $1.425 – 1.5 Billion to
    vest, anything less and they get nothing. To borrow a phrase from a hit TV
    show, it’s “Deal, or no deal!” Best of all, I believe NDM is now truly a
    takeover target.
    The “buy the rumor, sell the news” was exacerbated yesterday by conditions
    in the overall financial markets and apparently one big seller, which if true,
    would be a fund since HD believes its major shareholder RTZ was not a seller.
    Not only do I assume them to be correct, but it’s not in RTZ’s best interest to
    turn around and sell. They have already spoken of Pebble in corporate
    presentations as part of their future production http://www.smh.com.au/
    articles/2007/08/01/1185647978801.html. My personal opinion is they
    should end up deciding to get the other 50% of Pebble and use the nearly
    20% stake in NDM itself as the way. If I were RTZ, I would also try and get
    a board seat on NDM thanks to their stake. Now, I also feel NDM must realize
    this and while they’re in no need of further major capital, having another
    significant player take a stake in their shares would be a good thing.
    I’m certain some holders are disappointed that NDM wasn’t taken over and
    that in itself may have contributed to the sell-off, but as far as this shareholder
    is concerned, the company I own a lot of shares in is far better off this week
    than it was last week. Already I’m reading analysts’ comments ( see http://
    www.cbc.ca/cp/business/070801/b0801148A.html) and hearing from astute
    mining experts who agree that NDM has made a great deal and the shares
    are all but certain to take back the drop of yesterday and then some.
    Let me conclude by saying something I shall never grow tired of, “NDM is
    the single best mining and exploration stock to own today in my humble but
    extremely biased opinion.”

    Canada Press
    Published: Wednesday, August 1, 2007 | 6:05 PM ET
    Canadian Press: BRENDA BOUW
    TORONTO (CP) - Analysts who follow Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (TSXV:NDM) shook their heads and the CEO was keeping a stiff upper lip Wednesday after the Vancouver company's shares plunged nearly 14 per cent after news that Anglo American plc will invest US$1.4 billion to become a 50 per cent partner in the Canadian junior's Alaskan mining project.

    Northern Dynasty stock closed down $2.22 to $13.88 on the TSX Venture Exchange on Wednesday despite analysts' praise of the deal and the company's confidence of its unprecedented terms.

    "I think it's a great deal and I don't know why the shares are down," said Craig Miller, a mining analyst and vice-president at BMO Capital Markets.

    While the mining sector was down 2.6 per cent on a dismal day for Toronto's stock markets, Northern Dynasty's drop was much steeper at 13.8 per cent.

    "The only thing I can think of is that people see giving up 50 per cent of a project as something negative, but in reality they (Northern Dynasty) needed a partner and they needed the funding," Miller said.

    Northern Dynasty's largest shareholder, British mining giant Rio Tinto, owns nearly 20 per cent of the company and there is some speculation on the street that investors believe Rio Tinto lost out to Anglo American for the partnership.

    Continue Article

    Another analyst, who didn't want to be named, said some investors are simply frustrated Northern Dynasty wasn't taken over altogether. That said, the analyst is also surprised at the negative reaction to the Anglo American deal.

    "The reality is it's a very good deal for Northern Dynasty," said the analyst, adding the value of the deal is about $2.9 billion, well above Dynasty's market capital of $1.4 billion after markets closed Tuesday, when the deal was announced.

    Ron Thiessen, president and CEO of Northern Dynasty, chalked up the stock's drop to overall negative market sentiment Wednesday.

    "It's a bit like the tide, the tide is moving out, but I expect the tide to return," said Thiessen in a telephone interview from Alaska where he was meeting with key project stakeholders.

    Thiessen dismissed speculation that Rio Tinto was excluded from the pact, and said he is unaware of any potential takeovers of his company at this time.

    As for the deal's terms, Thiessen said his company told the market more than a year ago it was seeking a 50-50 partner to advance the metals project.

    He also said the deal is unprecedented since it has no operator, no management fees and no veto rights.

    "I am sure we'll be rewarded eventually, projects like these are long term projects, we'll get there," Thiessen said.

    Northern Dynasty announced its Anglo American partnership late Tuesday, adding that the South African company will engineer, permit and construct a copper, gold and molybdenum mine that will begin production by 2015.

    Anglo's investment starts with a US$125 million commitment to complete a pre-feasibility study targeted by the end of next year and spend another US$325 million for another study by 2011.

    "This is expected to take the partnership to a production decision," Northern Dynasty said.

    If a mine is to go ahead at that stage, Anglo would spend another US$975 million to help the mine into production.

    After that, Northern Dynasty said the mine costs would be split 50-50 between the two companies.

    If the feasibility study is completed after 2011, Anglo's overall funding requirement increases to US$1.5 billion.

    Northern Dynasty said it will assess its share of any project debt financing when a production decision is made.

    The partnership agreement provides for equal project control rights with no operator's fees payable to either party.

    The Pebble project's key assets are the near surface, 4.1 billion tonne, open pit style Pebble West deposit and the deeper and higher grade 3.4 billion tonne Pebble East deposit that is amenable to underground bulk mining methods.

    Northern Dynasty bought an 80 per cent interest in the Pebble project in November 2004 and exercised its right to buy the remaining 20 per cent in March 2005.

    Northern Dynasty is part of the Hunter Dickinson group of companies that provides services to publicly traded companies involved in mineral exploration, development and production.

    Anglo American is one of the world's largest mining and natural resource groups with operations in 45 countries across Africa, Europe, Australia, South and North America, and Asia.

    Northern Dynasty & Anglo American Partner Up on Pebble

    By Jon A. Nones
    01 Aug 2007 at 06:48 PM GMT-04:00

    St. LOUIS (Resourceinvestor.com) -- Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. [AMEX:NAK; TSX-V:NDM] announced late yesterday that Anglo American [Nasdaq:AAUK; LSE:AAL] will pay $1.425 billion for a 50% ownership in the massive Pebble copper-gold-molybdenum project in Alaska. NDM shareholders less than applauded the deal, sending stock prices down 13%.

    Shares had gained 16% in last three days leading up to the news, posting a new 52-week high of $15.61 yesterday. But shareholders sold hard on Wednesday, perhaps let down that there wasn’t a full takeover in the works.

    Frank Holmes, CEO of US Global Investors, which holds about a 2.4% stake in NDM, told RI that investors were disappointed in just that. But he added that some shareholders may have been concerned about the timeline of the development schedule as well.

    According to the agreement, Anglo must first commit $125 million to complete a pre-feasibility study by the end of 2008, and then commit a further $325 million for a feasibility study by 2011. Upon the decision to develop a mine, Anglo must pay $975 million for a total of $1.425 billion to retain its 50% interest.

    If the feasibility study is completed after 2011, Anglo's overall funding requirement increases to US$1.5 billion. Any further expenditure will be funded on a 50-50 basis, and NDM will assess its 50% share of any project debt financing when a production decision is made.

    Holmes said the deal is financially rewarding for the company, but “people don’t like the uncertainty” that comes with of adding more time to the schedule. The company previously estimated construction to begin in 2011 and production in 2013.

    The Pebble property is massive, totalling 153 square miles in southern Alaska. The projects key assets are the near surface, 4.1 billion tonne, open pit style Pebble West deposit and the deeper and higher grade 3.4 billion tonne Pebble East deposit.

    Bruce W. Jenkins, COO of Northern Dynasty Minerals told RI that the company had previously estimated Pebble West to cost around $2 billion to develop, but halted the pre-feasibility study to include Pebble East. He could not yet estimate the total capex for the entire project, but said it would be “in the billions.”

    Jenkins said in six years of exploration and development, the company has spent about $200 million on the project, with $96 million slated for this year alone.

    At Pebble West, drilling to date has revealed total in-situ resources of 24.7 billion pounds of copper, 42.1 million ounces of gold and 1.35 billion pounds of molybdenum at a 0.30% copper equivalent cut-off grade. Pebble East is estimated to host 42.9 billion pounds of copper, 39.6 million ounces of gold and 2.7 billion pounds of molybdenum at a 0.60% cut-off grade.

    Even at conservative estimates of 49 billion pounds of copper, 64 million ounces of gold and 2.9 billion pounds of molybdenum, Pebble is the world’s second largest copper-gold deposit.

    Despite shareholder unrest today, NDM has always hinted that it might need help to develop so a big project. Therefore, analysts have long noted Pebble as an acquisition target, both in part and as a whole.

    Lawrence Roulston, editor of Resource Opportunities, said back in 2004 that mining majors need big plays like Pebble to have a meaningful impact.

    “It is almost a foregone conclusion that a project as attractive as Pebble will ultimately be acquired by a major. It is just a matter of when,” he said.

    This is now the second major mining firm to concurrently endorse Pebble. Last year, Rio Tinto acquired about a 20% stake by buying about half of Galahad Gold’s 21% interest. The rest of Galahad's stake was subsequently sold into the market.

    Peter Grandich, editor of The Grandich Letter, and long-time shareholder of NDM, has often said NDM would be fully taken out or some sort of partnership would be done. He said no fewer than 16 companies had signed confidentially agreements with NDM prior to the deal with Anglo.

    “While it’s early, it wouldn’t come as a surprise to me to later learn that NDM has hired bankers to explore the sale of their remaining ownership, especially once new drill results are released,” said Grandich in an e-mailed update today.

    He said a consortium “still can’t be ruled out,” and Rio’s near 20% ownership may be incentive enough for others parties to buy into Pebble.

    “For far too long, NDM was an orphan among the institutional community but with Anglo as a partner and Rio as a major shareholder, I fully anticipate NDM vaulting towards the top of most mining share institutional shopping lists,” he added.

    But even Grandich admitted that the deal by “no means makes NDM a slam-dunk or without risk.” The company must still overcome strong environmental opposition, which has plagued the project since its inception.

    Local stakeholders and environmentalists are concerned, amongst other things, about its potential impact on salmon fishing in the Bristol Bay watershed. The concerns raised and the company’s environmental responses have been covered in depth by RI in the past.

    Ron Thiessen, President and CEO of Northern Dynasty, noted in a statement today that Alaska's environmental standards and permitting requirements are among the most stringent in the world.

    “Northern Dynasty's experienced, largely Alaskan based, mine development team has been undertaking thorough and balanced technical, environmental and social assessments to ensure that the Pebble project is developed in a manner that protects the environment and traditional ways of life,” he said.

    He said the mine would bring direct benefits to the local communities and serve as a catalyst for sustainable economic development in the region and across the State.

    NDM has continued with its extensive environmental programme; out of a total investment of $56 million this year 38% of it ($21 million) has been on environmental and socioeconomic projects.

    Shares of Northern Dynasty fell $2.04 or 13.4% to close at $13.13 on AMEX on heavy volume of more than 2 million shares. But despite the selloff today, NDM stock is up more than 77% so far this year.

    Holmes concluded in saying he like the deal going forward as a shareholder, and August is historically a very good time to buy gold shares.

    “3.4 billion tonnes grading 1.00% copper equivalent, containing 42.6 billion pounds of copper, 39.6 million ounces of gold, and 2.7 billion pounds of molybdenum.”

    This is just a tremendous amount of minerals and has a value of over $200 billion using today’s metal prices. NAK estimates it will have low project costs of $0.3/lb of copper and $50/oz of gold which would make this company extremely profitable. This immense amount of minerals will and has already seen huge interest from the majors.

    This mine is world class because of its large mineral deposit, its long estimated life, and NAK’s low project costs of $0.3/lb of copper and $50/oz of gold. Rio Tinto , a $80 Billion mining and exploration company has taken a 19.9% stake in the company that values NAK at around $900 million. Production is slated to begin sometime in 2010 with construction of the mine starting in 2008.

    The main risk with this company is getting regulatory approval to mine. There is currently heavy opposition to this Mine, mostly from the wildlife associations that want to protect the environment. A good description of whose for and whose against this mine can be found on Wikipedia, by going here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_Mine

    Although there is heavy opposition, this mine would supply the United States for decades and in times where natural resources are extremely scare and getting increasingly expensive.

    Rio Tinto is definitely interested in taking NAK out but that might not happen. Tinto might not be able to take them out cheaply due to the shareholder rights plan NAK has instated: http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/061212/0193989.html

    NAK currently has no debt and is being fed liquidity from Rio Tinto. This mine is a world class asset and I believe it will definitely be mined starting in the beginning of the next decade. NAK’s current market capitalization of $815 million doesn’t fully take into account the immense potential that this mine offers.

    Renowned options trader Phil Davis makes a good comparison of NAK to AUY here: http://gold.seekingalpha.com/article/11693

    Overall, NAK looks like a good value play that can deliver profits to its shareholders for many decades into the future. It is also a good play on the increasing price of gold and copper.

    I am sure many of us did, but I can guarantee the people who have owned Northern Dynasty (NAK), has had nothing but a big smile on their face. Northern Dynasty Minerals is a Canadian based mineral company who engages in exploration of copper, gold, and molybdenum in Alaska. The company has ‘The Pebble Project’ which has not been fully explored but continues to confirm ‘that it is potentially amenable to high volume, underground mining.’

    With that said, Rio Tinto, a 92.24 billion dollar mineral company based on its market cap, has positioned themselves the max amount in Northern Dynasty due to legal agreement threshold. Now, why would a company position themselves into a small mineral company like Northern Dynasty?

    Well, I have two explanations behind this:

    • Potential buy-out
    • Stock is priced cheaper than its true value

    For starters, Rio Tinto taking an approximately 20% stake into Northern Dynasty proves the validity behind Northern Dynasty exploration within the Pebbles region and the true value with their minerals.

    Now, some may look at their balance sheet and say what is the underlying value? Their underlying value lies in the minerals that they own.

    • 18.8 billion pounds of copper @ $0.05/lb (conservatively) = $94 million
    • 31.3 million ounces of gold @ $80/oz (conservatively) = $2.5 billion
    • 993 million pounds of molybdenum @ $0.02/lb (conservatively) = $19.86 million

    The combined value of this is approximately $3.6 billion and the market cap is $1.39 billion value. Without even including the implied resources which has not been discovered as they are still exploring, the company is worth way more than their market value. With a $3.6 billion approximately true value / 99.3 million shares outstanding calculates into an approximate $39 dollar stock price. At the current price of about $15 dollars that is about a 160% increase if it is held long term. Now, let us say it is bought out at what people are speculating, $25. It still leaves you with a nifty profit.

    Update: Northern Dynasty Minerals has about a $60 million in liabilities. Therefore the “true value” (I am using this term loosely, as I think it is valued higher) is 3.54 billion / 99.3 million, which is approximately $35 dollar stock price

    FP Trading Desk submits:
    Raymond James analyst Tom Meyer has initiated coverage on Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) with a "strong buy" rating and a whopping price target of C$25 a share, nearly double its current level. Why so bullish? First of all, the valuation. Northern Dynasty trades at a price to net asset value multiple of 0.27 times. That's a 68% discount to the peer group of development companies, he wrote in a note to clients.

    He is also impressed with the company's Pebble project in Alaska, which has 434,000 tons per year of copper in concentrate and is due to be in production by early 2015. Besides the copper, it also has a great deal of gold and molybdenum, which Mr. Meyer sees as a good way to get exposure to those commodities.

    Mr. Meyer also expects the company to attract a lot of interest from potential financiers because of its low cash costs and long mine life. Rio Tinto PLC already controls nearly 20% of the company.

    "We believe that Rio Tinto's 19.8% interest in the project is a form of validation of the significance of Pebble to senior producers, and we anticipate further interest in the project with the expected release of the [Integrated Development Plan] in mid-2008," he wrote.

    NAK 1-year chart




    im Iacono submits: How does a gold exploration company move their share price 50 percent higher in just six months without issuing a press release?

    Keep finding gold and make others work to find out just how much gold you are finding.

    That seems to be the story at Northern Dynasty Minerals...

    [Note: This is a slightly edited version of a company update that went out to subscribers at Iacono Research just a few days ago - shares of Northern Dynasty were added to the model portfolio late last year with additional shares purchased yesterday. If you are interested in investing in the great natural resources bull market of the early 21st century, you might want to sign up for a Free Trial to see what it's all about.]

    Northern Dynasty Minerals (AMEX:NAK) is one of the best-positioned companies in the gold mining industry to benefit from rising metal prices either by building a mine or by being acquired - the company's Pebble West Project is huge, but the Pebble East Project looks like it will be even bigger.

    Saturday, August 11, 2007

    CF Industries (CF)

    CF Industries quarterly earnings double on robust fertilizer sales

    by Soo-kyung Seo
    Jul 31, 2007

    CF Industries Holdings Inc. more than doubled its second-quarter earnings from a year ago, driven by increased pricing and volume in nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer, the company reported after the market closed Monday.

    The Deerfield, Ill.-based chemical fertilizer producer and distributor reported its net earnings in the quarter ended June 30 jumped to $93.6 million, or $1.65 per diluted share, from $42.6 million, or 77 cents per diluted share, in the same period a year ago. The result exceeded analysts’ estimate of $1.50 per diluted share, according to Yahoo Finance.

    The company said robust corn farming activities in the spring bolstered the sales of CF Industries’ fertilizers and led to the company’s big profit gains. U.S. farmers planted the largest corn crop since 1945, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    “Our well-positioned inventories and flexible distribution system enabled us to deliver excellent results in the face of this rapidly changing business environment,” said Stephen R. Wilson, Chairman and CEO of CF Industries Holdings Inc.

    The company’s net sales in the second quarter advanced 23 percent to $848.9 million from $688.7 million in the same period a year earlier. Total sales volume increased about 6.6 percent to 2.75 million tons in the quarter from 2.58 million tons in the same period a year earlier.

    “Overall, things proceeded much better than I expected,” Morningstar Inc. analyst Ben Johnson said. “Corn-related [farming] activities, in particular, benefited the company a lot as corn farming is more nitrogen fertilizer intensive compared with other crops.” Nitrogen fertilizer is one of the company’s main products.

    Average selling prices of all nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer products were 21 percent higher in the second quarter compared with a year ago, the company said.

    A phosphate fertilizer price increase, in particular, reflected “improved fundamentals in domestic and world phosphate markets, and improved phosphate pricing more than offset a modest decline in volume,” the company said.

    CF Industries' operating earnings nearly doubled to $159.4 million in the quarter from $85.3 million from last year.

    Second-quarter results included $36.3 million in non-cash pre-tax unrealized losses, or 41 cents per diluted shares on an after-tax basis, from mark-to-market adjustments on natural gas derivatives associated with the company’s Forward Pricing Program (FPP), according to the news release.

    CF Industries said it signed an agreement with Uhde Corporation of America to develop a gasification project to help reduce the company’s dependence on North American natural gas. The company could begin construction in the second half of 2009.

    The company has also signed an exclusivity agreement with NUKEM Inc. “to explore the feasibility of developing and constructing a uranium recovery facility” at the company’s complex in Florida.

    Amid speculation that the U.S. may add more nuclear power plants, “uranium demand could be an incremental profit opportunity for companies..involved in this type of project,” Johnson said. The gasification project would also put the company at a cost advantage in the global market, he added.

    The company announced that it will pay the regular quarterly dividend of 2 cents per common share on August 31 to stockholders of record on August 15, 2007.

    CF Industries’ stock closed Tuesday at $57.48, down 24 cents, or 0.42 percent from Monday’s close.

    Monday, August 6, 2007

    Brookfield Asset Management: An Attractive Long-Term Investment

    George Spritzer submits: Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has been on my watch list for quite sometime, and I finally purchased a "toe in the water" position during Friday's sell-off. The company has a great long-term record, and shareholder-friendly management. If you look at a 15-year performance chart on BAM, you will see that they have not only handily beaten the S&P 500- they have also beaten Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA).

    BAM is basically a publicly traded private equity company, but you don't need to pay high management or incentive fees. I like the idea that they are focussed primarily on global infrastructure asset management as opposed to general private equity.

    The company manages and builds high quality, long-life cash flow generating assets with barriers to entry, and it has shown good discipline in choosing projects with a high return of capital. At this time, its main areas of focus are in property, power, timber, and transmission in several regions around the world.

    BAM is a cash flow cow. In 2006, its cash flow grew from to $1.8 billion (from 908MM in 2005).

    It is planning to spin-off a newly created publicly traded partnership (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP), which should be very attractive to income-oriented investors. I think the sum of the parts after the spin-off will be greater than the whole.

    The recent Minnesota bridge collapse highlights the importance of infrastructure projects not only overseas, but in the U.S. as well, and I believe more money will be allocated to infrastructure in the U.S. in the near future. I plan to continue dollar cost averaging into BAM, and retain it as a long-term holding.

    Full disclosure: The author is long BAM

    Danaher Corp. (DHR): Makes everything and keeps growing

    A leader in the industrial sector, Danaher Corp. (NYSE: DHR) designs, makes and markets brand name products, services and tech across three categories: Professional Instrumentation (electronic testing, environmental, and medical technologies); Industrial Technologies (motion and product Identification; aerospace and defense, power quality, and sensors and controls); and Tools & Components (which include mechanics' tools and general tools under brand names such as Craftsman.)

    It is a leader in many of its classes, with names like Fluke (handheld electronic and network test equipment), Gilbarco Veeder-Root (retail petroleum dispenser market), and Hach/Lange (water analytics). A huge company in the industrial sector can sometimes seem overwhelming (what ARE all of these things, after all? you might ask...), but the thing to know first is that Danaher is solid as they get, with great margins, good management, and is well positioned for continuing growth, particularly through acquisitions.

    On July 19, after DHR's excellent second quarter earnings report, Goldman Sachs wrote that Danaher was "well-positioned" for the 2H2007 upside. Time to get in now, its report suggested, and I agree. It set a nice price target of $90. With low operating risk, and consistent growth of revenue, Danaher is a safer pick. Plus, as the Goldman report points out, it is "a leader in defensive growth markets like water, electronic test, and medical," making its price less susceptible to the recent jitters in the market.

    Type of Stock: An industrial designer, manufacturer, and marketer, Danaher is a leader in its class in many areas, and has demonstrated solid growth in areas less likely to suffer by market instability.

    Price Target: Trading now at $75.80, I agree with the Goldman target of $90 and feel Danaher is well positioned to even exceed this.

    Wednesday, August 1, 2007

    5 stocks for next 25 years:

    Electro-Optical Sciences
    Posted May 2nd 2007 2:00PM
    Yared

    This begins the actual stock selections of the (hopefully) top 5 stocks for the next 25 years. These companies will play in nascent markets with a huge addressable audience and with great management and vision. They will become the leaders and game changers for the next generation of stocks.

    The 25 companies are in no particular order, just random order. Keep in mind that because I am attempting to identify home runs for the more distant future, these names will be smaller capitalization names in general, or the math will not work out for investors.

    The top 25 for the NEXT 25 years begins with Electro-Optical Sciences (NASDAQ: MELA).

    MELA is $60 million market capitalization (total shares times by the current price) company. MELA trades at $4.50 per share and the average daily volume is about 35,000 shares per day -- not what you would call the most liquid name. But the potential and the market it will serve is massive and worldwide.

    MELA is in phase III clinical trials on a device that will assist general practitioner physicians and dermatologists in the detection of melanoma, skin cancer. Typically when a physician suspects that a skin lesion or an abnormality is present, the first course of action is a biopsy. The biopsy is a bit painful and certainly expensive. There are over three million biopsies performed in the United States alone, double that amount worldwide.

    MELA's device is a small machine easily used by the physician. It is linked to a central server system via the internet whereby the physician can determine, with extraordinary help and resources, if the mole or lesion should then be biopsied for more analysis. The good news is the vast majority of skin moles and lesions are benign and further treatment is not necessary. The bad news is that melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, but is virtually 100% curable if caught early. Many patients are mis-diagnosed or not diagnosed until too late. With MELA's technology and systems, the occurrence of mis-diagnosis could drop off dramatically.

    To date, MELA has conducted tests on over 5,000 skin lesions at 20 different clinical sites. Its efficacy has been superior to any other methodology. MELA anticipates the completion of Phase III clinical trials by the end of the first quarter of 2008. With Food and Drug Administration approval expected before mid-year 2008, when the roll-out process would begin in earnest. Sales and marketing personnel are slowly being added to the company's staff. Training sales reps takes a good six months to accomplish.

    MELA could begin to realize significant revenues before 2008 year-end, with a powerful ramp in revenues to $30 million in 2009 and $50 million in 2010. Being a medical device, the eventual operating margins could approach the 30% level. As MELA rolls out to the marketplace over the next couple of decades, this company could grow to a billion dollar revenue base with explosive earnings.

    MELA has signed an agreement with L'Oreal, the giant cosmetics manufacturer, as L'Oreal wants to better understand skin types and the appropriate cosmetics to meet this need. No dollar amount has been placed on the partnership with L'Oreal.

    Electro-Optical Sciences is headquartered in suburban New York City. For this company to build out its sales and marketing force as well as its manufacturing facility, I would expect it to come back to the public markets to raise more capital. That's normally a very good sign that the business plan is progressing along well.

    MELA has life saving implications addressing a massive market with minimal to no competition. It could be a top stock for the NEXT 25 years.



    ZOLTEK (ZOLT)

    Zoltek is headquartered in suburban St. Louis, Missouri and has a current market capitalization of $1.1 billion. The stock is trading at $39. For full disclosure, I have been recommending Zoltek to the members of my web site since $19-20 just a few months ago. The stock is still a buy.

    Zoltek develops, manufactures and distributes carbon fiber which has hundreds of applications. Zoltek is considered an alternative energy company as carbon fiber weighs less than traditional materials and therefore employs far less energy. Some of the applications are in primary building materials: Sporting goods, aircraft braking systems, and the blades on energy creating wind turbines. Zoltek has received a lot of attention in the wind turbines sector as the demand is very high for these windmill-looking energy generators. The carbon fiber making up the blades requires little to no maintenance and is lighter allowing for faster revolutions. Thus, more energy is generated by using Zoltek's carbon fiber.

    Currently, Zoltek's carbon fiber is found in small production, high performance automobiles. Zoltek is developing applications with the auto industry for larger production, lower cost models. The auto and airline industry will provide huge growth opportunities for Zoltek, especially as vehicle or plane weight is relevant to energy savings.

    Zoltek's entire production capacity for 2007 and 2008 is already booked. The company's visibility to revenues and earnings is at 100%. Zoltek is working on expanding its current production capacity as the company sees an ever growing demand for its products world-wide.

    Zoltek.s numbers are quite impressive with huge growth. The company has a September 30 fiscal year end. For September 30, 2007 I estimate Zoltek's revenues at $158 million and earnings per share of $.79. For September 30, 2008 I estimate revenues of $250 million and earnings per share of $ 1.52. The company has a stated revenue goal for fiscal year 2009 of $500 million. It may prove to be a little aggressive, but the growth rate for ZOLT is dramatic.

    The industrial world is gradually moving to a model of tougher materials at a lighter weight. Zoltek's carbon fiber product fits the bill superbly. What makes Zoltek's addressable market so large is the heat resistance of carbon fiber: It does not weaken or break down under high heat conditions.

    Zoltek has had a good run so far but the applications and manufacturing capacity are ever expanding. Zoltek has a tremendous opportunity to be a Top 25 Stock for the NEXT 25 Years...


    Crocs (that's right...Crocs)

    The NEXT stock on my list of top 25 stocks for the NEXT 25 years is Crocs (NASDAQ: CROX). I hesitated on this company because I have been following it very closely since its IPO in early 2006 and have been recommending it to my members on my web site since the shares traded at $44. Currently Crocs is at $74-75 sporting a market capitalization of $2.9 billion. This company however has the opportunity to be a major global player in the footwear and apparel industries.

    Crocs manufactures its unique footwear from specialty resins that allows for the foot to breath and experience self-molded comfort. Yet, the shoes sell for $29.99 to $59.99 at the retail level. The shoes are unique in design and are offered in bold, dramatic colors. Crocs shoes appeal to toddlers to the elderly, across all demographic lines and in almost all geographies. What makes Crocs so dynamic is its distribution model. Although the company only operates about 100 self-serve kiosks, the other avenues of distribution are over 24,000: 11,500 in the United States and 13,500 in the rest of the world. The company also operates a dynamic web site allowing direct customer purchases at, of course, higher margins.

    Crocs has successfully entered the fashion-forward university market with over 100 license agreements signed. It has inked agreements with the NFL and the NHL as well. Because the specialty resins are applicable for other products, Crocs is marketing unique products for kayaks and canoes to scuba diving fins.

    Crocs offers a line of t-shirts, sweatshirts and other cool apparel as well as Jibbitzs, which appeals to children. Jibbitz are little attachments that kids love to "fill in the holes" of their Crocs shoes. They come in various cartoon and television characters. Crocs also sells wristbands, school backpacks, coffee mugs and many other interesting and unique products.

    The story of Crocs lies within its margins. The company has already achieved operating margins in the mid 20's% with room to expand them even more. It is a highly profitable company which is unique for such an early-stage high growth concept. Crocs is determined to keep its product line fresh, hip and cutting-edge. The company has no intention of being viewed as a fad as fads can disappear as quickly as they appear. Crocs wants to model itself after NIKE (NYSE: NKE), which has stood the test of time and remained relevant for over 30 years.

    Crocs has a long way to go before it is considered the "next Nike," but the company is well on its way. Revenues for 2007 I estimate at $615 million with earnings per share at about $2.90-2.95. For 2008 I estimate revenues at $800 million and earnings per share at $3.70. For a footwear/apparel vendor to have such high ,and more importantly, sustainable operating margins in the 20's%+, the valuation of Crocs will always command a generous and deserved higher PE ratio. The stock is trading at a 20 PE to 2008 estimates and is still not fully valued. With its accelerated growth rate Crocs' stock price could be justified with a 25-30 times forward PE ratio.

    Crocs is on the list of 25 best stocks for the NEXT 25 years because of its global strength and excellent management team. By the way, if you have not tried a pair...try em!! I just got two pair from my kids for my birthday (age not relevant!) and I love them...



    The next name in my continuing series of Top 5 stocks for the NEXT 25 years is Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE: CMG). The opportunity to expand and grow for Chipotle is so large that this company could become the next McDonald's (NYSE: MCD). In fact, one of the first and biggest investors in Chipotle was McDonald's. McDonald's invested in Chipotle in late 1999, enabling the young concept to have the necessary capital to expand its geographic reach beyond its headquarter base of Denver, Colorado.

    I have been recommending Chipotle to members of my web site since last September when the stock was trading at $49. The shares are now at $82, representing a market capitalization of $2.6 billion. The company has a store unit base of 600 locations, but the exciting part of the story is that Chipotle is just starting. This company has an extremely loyal following of customers who visit Chipotle on average three times per month. The food is authentic Mexican and it is as fresh as fresh can be. The menu is simple in nature -- burritos, tacos and salads. The pork and chicken served is organically raised and the vegetables and bean are almost totally organic. Simply put: the food is excellent and healthy and the surroundings pleasant and inviting.

    As I mentioned, I have been on this stock since $49; why is it still one to accumulate at the $82 level? Chipotle is tapping into the American appetite for freshly prepared Mexican food. With only 600 units in its base, Chipotle has the room to grow the concept by a factor of 15-20 times. The U.S. market alone will easily absorb 10,000-12,000 units before any discussion of saturation creeps in. Chipotle is appealing to all demographic and ethnic tastes. The Mexican population in the United States frequents Chipotle's as the food is similar to home cooking.

    McDonald's has a market capitalization of $62 billion or about 30 times the size of Chipotle.This is the model for Chipotle to emulate. Chipotle has a loyal following of customers excited about bringing in new customers, as the dining experience is worthwhile.

    Chipotle went public in February 2006 and has exceeded expectations every quarter. My estimates for 2007/2008 for revenues and earnings per share are $1.06 billion and $1.72 and $1.32 billion and $2.20 respectively. Currently the operating margins are in the 7-8% range with huge room to grow. Chipotle is investing in new store openings and advertising, although so much of the business comes from word of mouth. As the concept matures over time the operating margins will be in the 16-19% range.

    McDonald's has divested itself from its share holdings in Chipotle. Investors were relieved when McDonald's sold its last remaining shares in late 2006, thus allowing for individual and institutional shareholders to no longer be concerned about McDonald's intentions. McDonald's was purely an investor with no other involvement. Chipotle management did learn quite a bit from McDonald's in terms of supply chain and inventory management.

    With the concept gaining national prominence and acceptance, Chipotle can indeed become the next major fast-casual food retailer in the United States and reward its shareholders along the way quite handsomely. The stock has had a huge run up since the IPO and investors may want to nibble away at beginning a position. But keep in mind this company has the chance to be a 30-40 bagger over the next couple of decades.

    The NEXT company in my ongoing series of the top 5 stocks for the NEXT 25 years is SurModics, Inc. (NASDAQ: SRDX). This Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company has a current market capitalization of $650 million with a revenue run rate of $75 million. The company is actively involved in many next-generation medical technologies.

    SurModics' mission is to provide leading-edge surface modifications and advanced drug delivery technologies and products. The company is divided into three distinct divisions: drug delivery, hydrophillic and In-Vitro. The drug delivery segment offers various technologies to site-specific delivery of drugs. Within this segment is the burgeoning ophthalmology division, which helps deal with serious eye diseases such as age-related macular degeneration. The hydrophillic segment has proprietary technologies for medical devices. It's a lubricious coating that allows for better placement and maneuverability of the actual devices. The In-Vitro division includes products for genomic slide technologies and stabilization products for immunoassay diagnostic testing.

    SurModics sells its products to a whole host of medical device and life sciences companies. The hydrophillic business segment will normally have a very long term commitment with its medical device customer, as SurModic will specifically formulate the lubricant to compliment the device company's requirements to satisfy the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The same with the two other divisions as SurModics is usually involved early on in the development and FDA approval process.

    The ophthalmology division has the potential for exponential growth as serious eye disease is an increasingly common medical affliction in an aging population. As the incidence of diabetes increases in an aging baby boomer set, SurModics is involved in the research and development of treating diabetic macular edema. As the treatment enters Phase III clinical work, SurModics has arranged for a long-term royalty structure.

    I estimate SurModics to generate revenues this year ending September 30, 2007 of $75 million with earnings per share of $1.40. For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, I believe SurModics will generate revenues of $85 million with earnings per share of $1.63. The hyper-growth stage could begin in mid to late 2008 as the opthalmological products gain a strong foothold in the medical market place. Normally, once a company has attained FDA approval, other nations tend to follow quite quickly. With macular-degeneration unfortunately being a "growth illness" unto itself, the opportunity for SurModics is enormous.

    The other divisions of SurModics will also provide solid and consistent growth. With all of the development and cutting edge work that SurModics is involved with, this company has a strong opportunity to be a top 25 stock for the NEXT 25 years.

    DEXCOM (DXCM)

    DexCom, Inc (NASDAQ: DXCM). This San Diego, California-based company has the opportunity to address the millions of people that suffer from diabetes. DexCom manufactures a continuous glucose monitoring system, which is extremely user-friendly and helps improve the diabetics' quality of life.

    DexCom's business model is the classic razor-razor blade. DexCom sells a wireless glucose monitoring device, for about $800 per unit. Because of the wireless component, the monitor is completely mobile with the patient and can even be hooked to a belt like a cell phone. The company also sells the "implantable" disposable sensors that the patients slip-in just under the skin. Each sensor is good for up to 72 hours. The sensors come in a five-pack and sell for about $175 a pack.

    Patients no longer have to endure the painful finger prick to draw a minor amount of blood to detect their glucose level. Also, with the monitor and sensors, the readings are far more accurate and continuous so the patient can administer the necessary insulin at the precise time versus a bit of a guessing game.

    The company has a market capitalization of $185 million and is not yet profitable. I expect sales to reach about $9-10 million this calendar year and a loss of about $1.30 per share. For calendar 2008 I estimate DexCom's revenues to reach $27 million and a shrinking loss per share of $0.80. The biggest issue facing DexCom is insurance reimbursement. Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers do not yet reimburse patients for the expenses incurred.

    The company is lobbying the medical insurance systems for reimbursement. The Juvenile Diabetes Association has endorsed DexCom's products wholeheartedly and will lend its influence with the various federal jurisdictions.

    As with most new medical device companies, the mega expense is the sales and marketing costs. The market needs to be seeded and the best way to accomplish this is with "feet on the street." The earnings leverage will come with revenue growth driving down the sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales. The second driver to accelerated earnings and revenue growth will come when reimbursement is no longer an issue.

    DexCom is servicing a multi-billion dollar market, worldwide in scope with the most advanced product available. The razor-razor blade model will generate huge future operating margin. The best part of the DexCom story is the enhanced quality of life for the diabetic patient.