Sunday, December 2, 2007

Mechel (MTL)

Mechel is planning to build a cement factory with a capacity of 1 million metric tons a year, local business daily Kommersant reported Thursday, citing the company.

The forecasted $27/t increase would add $1.50 to the 2008 EPS contribution of the just announced acquisition, assuming a 25% tax rate and assuming that MTL gets all of the increase. This is in addition to the base (2007) performance of the acquisition, which could be $1 or more accretive depending on margins, realized prices, and the interest rate on debt used for the $2.3B acquisition.

$27/t x 10MMtpy x 0.75 / 139 = $1.50

Upon further review, my $1.50 EPS increase for the new assets from expected coal price increase is too high, as almost half of the acquired mine's output is steam coal, which sells for 20-40% lower price. Also, MTL is only buying the 75% they do not own, so there is less than a dollar EPS benefit in 2008 from the acquired assets from the expected increase in coal prices, assuming MTL gets all of the increase. The most significant benefit of the acquisition appears to be on the reserve side; MTL is paying only about $1 for each tonne of reserves, or about a penny on the dollar in terms of sales price. Of course, billions of dollars will probably be required to develop these reserves.

However, the benefit of coal price increases on existing production should be substantial - over $2.50 in EPS assuming an average $23 per tonne price increase on output of over 20MM tpy.

$23 x 21.5MM x 0.75 / 139 = $2.70

Again, MTL may not get full international price, even though they own a large portion of their transportation network. OTOH, previous increases in world prices have may not yet completely worked their way through to MTL.

Mechel's coal output is now approaching 30 Mt/y following its recent takeover of Yakutugol and purchase of Russia's largest known, undeveloped high quality coking coal deposit. Author: John Chadwick
Posted: Tuesday , 09 Oct 2007

LONDON -

As the result of an auction held on October 5, 2007, Mechel acquired 75% less one share of Yakutugol OJSHC's charter capital and 68.86% of Elgaugol OAO's charter capital, for a total of RUR58.2 billion (approximately US$2.3 billion). Thus, Mechel's stake in Yakutugol increases to 100%, given that the company already held 25% plus one share in its ownership.

Yakutugol mines mainly coking coal with some steam coal output. Its total coal output is about 10 Mt/y (more than half Mechel's current output). The coal reserves of Yakutugol's existing assets are estimated at approximately 200 Mt, according to Russian reserve valuation standards. Yakutugol is the largest Russian exporter of coking coal and sells most of its output to countries in the Pacific region, including Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.

Elgaugol holds the license for development of the Elga coal deposit with the total reserves of fat coking coals amounting to approximately 2,200 Mt. According to the experts' estimates, coal reserves in this region are 30,000 to 40,000 Mt. In addition, a real-estate complex owned by JSC Russian Railways was put up at the auction and acquired by Mechel. The complex includes the railway spur track from Zeisk station of the Far Eastern Railway to the Elga coal deposit and an access road from Zeisk station of the Far Eastern Railway to the Elga deposit.

Igor Zyuzin, Mechel's Chief Executive Officer, commented: "We are pleased with our victory at the auction. By acquiring Yakutugol, we have gained control over the last operating unprivatized coal asset, concluding a three-year privatization process. Although there had been some uncertainty among some investors that Mechel would obtain control over Yakutugol, we are glad that we proved our ability to bring all our undertakings to conclusion. Yakutugol will significantly strengthen Mechel's position on the Russian and international coking coal markets. Secondly, we obtained access to the largest deposit of high quality coking coals, which lays a reliable foundation for long term development of Mechel's coal mining. With ownership of Southern Kuzbass, Yakutugol, and Elgaugol, we hope to establish a world-class modern coal mining company. We plan to ship most of the mined coal to Russian consumers including Mechel's subsidiaries."

In 2006, Mechel produced approximately 17 Mt of coal comprising 9.7 Mt of coking coal and 7.3 Mt of steam coal.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Veolia Environnement: Investing in Water and Water ETFs

More than ever, we should turn our trend-spotting eyes to beyond our borders. In our increasingly globalized economy, there is money to be made everywhere.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

China's Next Commodity Binge


Despite its five-year, 1,250% run, uranium isn't even close to peaking. In fact, from a fundamental standpoint, it's a bargain.

Dwindling supplies, coupled with surging demand, could push prices substantially higher over the next 6 to 12 months. And as the cost of production remains relatively fixed, companies like Cameco (NYSE: CCJ), the world's largest uranium producer, are looking ahead to record profits.

To be sure, the pursuit of an alternative to fossil fuels has provoked an unbridled increase in demand for this power-rich commodity. And much of that, of course, comes from China…

Yet Another Commodity "Gap"

China's prolonged growth spurt has created a number of profit opportunities in recent years. In the commodities market, they've come in the form of wide supply and demand gaps.

In the past three years, for example, China's:

Insatiable demand for steel caused prices to double. And investors made 553% on international Mittal Steel Company in 13 months.

Copper requirements pushed Phelps-Dodge, the world's largest miner, up 253% in 16 months.

Voracious need for oil drained supply from OPEC and pushed prices up by 63%… Investors in Valero Energy, the nation's largest refinery, made a tidy 431% in 24 months.

Coal demands launched Fording Canadian Coal 268%.

Aluminum demands, to supply its soaring appliance and auto factories, pushed Empire Resources higher by 1,257%…
If you didn't cash in on these opportunities, uranium is your "second chance."

A $50 Billion Nuclear Initiative

The tide of global opinion has turned toward a solution for climate change, and as the world's second largest contributor of greenhouse gas emissions, pressure has been put on China to clean up its act.

The health of the Chinese population is suffering from densely contaminated air. China burns more coal than the European Union, United States, and Japan combined, and pollutants from coal-fired power plants account for approximately 400,000 premature deaths a year.

So it comes as no surprise that China is making a massive effort to embrace alternative energy sources like nuclear power. In addition to the nine nuclear reactors already operating in China, the government in Beijing is looking to build 30 more plants.

That's the largest nuclear power initiative ever undertaken, and the price tag is likely to exceed $50 billion USD. For its money, China would end up with 11% of the world's nuclear energy capability.

What this all adds up to is a huge run on uranium…

At the end 2003, when China first announced its plan, uranium was valued at $14.50 per pound. Now it sells for $133 - a 820% increase. And it's not done yet…

According to the Australian Foreign Ministry, with whom China has been negotiating, imports of uranium to China are set to increase from 2.5 million pounds per year, to an unprecedented level of 44 million pounds per year. That would be an increase of 1,760%, and close to one-quarter of the world's total uranium supply.

Unfortunately, supplies are running out…

The Commodity Crunch Leading To Record Profits

The world's leading uranium-mining countries have both seen a decline in production in recent years. Between 2005 and 2006, production has dropped from 11,628 tons to 9,862 tons in Canada, and from 9,516 tons to 7,593 tons in Australia.

Last year, the world's largest undeveloped uranium deposit (Canada's Cigar Lake mine, owned by Cameco) was suddenly rendered useless by a flood. This disaster put a halt to the extraction of 7 million pounds of uranium that were expected to be made available this year. Even worse, another 12 million pounds of uranium will come off the market through 2009.

What used to be a uranium surplus has also evaporated…

In 1993, the United States and Russia agreed to dismantle nuclear warheads left over from the Cold War and use the uranium to power nuclear reactors. This resulted in an excess supply of uranium for more than a decade. Now, more than 80% of that excess has been used up.

The industry's leading journal, The Uranium Market Outlook, has stated that above-ground uranium is at an all-time low, citing 30 years of underinvestment, stringent regulations, and an overall lack of exploration of uranium deposits.

International Nuclear, Inc., has reported that commercial reserves of uranium fell by 50% from 1985 to 2003. It has also reported that in 2004, only 54% of the uranium consumed in the world came from mining. The rest came from the depletion of existing reserves.

Countries like Japan and France rely heavily on uranium as a power source and are determined to secure supplies. But China's future demand remains a challenge.

There simply isn't enough uranium to satisfy the world's current needs. Indeed, $133 a pound may seem cheap in a matter of months.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Golar LNG

Traders should concentrate all their long bets in the transportation sector around international shipping and avoid any stocks dependent on domestic traffic. One name that we find interesting here is Golar LNG , which is an international liquefied-natural-gas shipper. The company has seen an upswing in business and shipping rates from Asia.

Golar LNG

Click here for larger image.

GLNG has recently broken out of consolidation formation and surged higher. What looks interesting in this chart is the bullish continuation pattern off of the spike in the stock last week. This suggests that GLNG may be getting ready to make another push to the upside. It has moved quite a bit in the last month, so conservative investors may want to sit this one out, but traders who are looking for an aggressive play should consider GLNG at these level

Golar Enters Lucrative Market

Sep. 21, 2007 (Investor's Business Daily delivered by Newstex) --

Transporting fuel overseas takes special equipment and handling skills, so experience matters. Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) GLNG has been offering its marine transportation services for more than 35 years.

The Bermuda-based firm traces its roots back to 1946, when Gotaas-Larsen Shipping was founded. It entered the liquefied natural gas (LNG) business in 1970 after being acquired by Osprey Maritime.

World Shipholding now owns a majority stake in Golar. It first started buying the company in 2000.

The shipping firm has been expanding into more lucrative markets. Golar recently signed a contract with Petroleo Brasileiro (NYSE:PBR) PBR, then converted two of its LNG carriers into floating storage and regasification units (FSRU), which command a much higher day rate than traditional shipping.

The day rate for FSRU is more than $100,000 vs. $65,000 per day for traditional shipping services, according to Friedman Billings Ramsey, which began covering Golar earlier this month with an outperform rating.

Branching out may serve the company well. Two companies, U.K.-based BG Group (NYSE:BRG) BRG and Indonesia's Pertomina, made up more than half of Golar's 2006 revenue with six long-term contracts.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Cummins Inc. CMI

25 October

I am flabbergasted by the reaction in Cummins Engine (CMI) today (as well as NII Holdings (NIHD

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Precision Castparts Corp (PCP)

Precision Castparts Corp.
By Alex Kolb
Oct 26, 2007
Precision Castparts Corp. (PCP) is doing a great job of returning value to shareholders as evidenced by PCP’s return on equity (ROE) of 26%. This figure is more than double the industry’s average of 11%. The company recently delivered fiscal second-quarter net income of $1.68 per share, surpassing last year’s $1.03 and exceeding the consensus estimate by two cents. PCP’s earnings per share have outpaced Wall Street estimates over the past five consecutive quarters.

Full Analysis

Precision Castparts Corp. is a worldwide manufacturer of complex metal components and products. The company is a market leader in manufacturing large, complex structural investment castings and is a leading manufacturer of airfoil castings used in jet aircraft engines. In addition, the company has expanded into the industrial gas turbine, fluid management, industrial metalworking tools and machines and other metal products markets.

The company recently delivered fiscal second-quarter net income of $1.68 per share, surpassing last year’s $1.03 and exceeding the consensus estimate by two cents. PCP’s earnings per share have outpaced Wall Street estimates over the past five consecutive quarters.

Analysts are upbeat on the company. Current third-quarter earnings forecasts of $1.71 per share are five cents higher than last week’s estimates and six cents ahead of the analyst expectations that were issued two months ago. Full-year projections for the year ending March of 2008 stand at $6.86 per share, compared to last week’s expectations of $6.78. Two months ago, the consensus estimate was pegged at $6.74.

Precision Castparts Corp. offers a dividend yield of 0.1% right now. This is higher than its industry average dividend level of 0.0%.

The company is doing a great job of returning value to shareholders as evidenced by PCP’s return on equity (ROE) of 26%. This figure is more than double the industry’s average of 11%.

PCP Precision Cast Parts

If Precision Castparts is added to the S&P 500, about 12 million shares of the company would have to be bought by funds that replicate the performance of the index, the analyst wrote, adding that he expects the shares to rise as high as $130.

The Portland, Oregon-based company fell $1.06 to $113.98 at 4 p.m. in regular New York Stock Exchange composite trading. They have rise 90 percent over the past year.

Globally, the recent targets have focused on the non-sheet segment, in favor of structural steel products used in non-residential construction and the energy markets.



Zacks Equity Research submits:
Precision Castparts Corp. (PCP) manufactures metal components and products for aerospace, power generation, general industrial and automotive markets. It operates in three segments: Investment Cast Products, Forged Products and Fastener Products. Also, the company was added to the S&P 500 in late May.

On May 9, the Zacks #1 Rank stock reported fiscal fourth-quarter earnings of $1.39 per share, up from 74 cents in the year-ago period and 12 cents above expectations. Continued strength in the commercial aerospace market drove revenues to $1,546 million, up 64% from the prior-year. All segments reported double-digit percentage increases in revenues. Investment Cast Products reported a 13.5% increase in sales to $477.3 million. Forged Products increased fourth quarter sales by 201.5% to $727.8 million. Lastly, the Fastener Products segment reported sales of $341.4 million, up 21.8% from last year.

A portion of the company’s most recent profits have been due to a successful acquisition strategy. Mark Donegan, CEO, commented, “Special Metals has certainly performed well beyond our initial projections and we have solid plans in place for continued upside. The company will remain relentlessly focused on cash…providing a solid platform for further profitable growth.”

On Jun 18, Precision Castparts announced that it will acquire Caledonian Alloys Group, a Scottish company that recycles nickel superalloy and titanium for the aerospace and industrial gas turbine industries. The acquisition is expected to close in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and will add immediately to earnings.

Following the company’s sixteenth consecutive earnings surprise, full-year fiscal 2008 estimates were increased by 52 cents to $6.04. Since then, estimates have been raised two additional times, most recently by three cents to $6.08. Fiscal 2009 projections have been guiding higher as well and currently stand at $7.02, implying year-over-year earnings growth of 15.5%. Furthermore, the company is ranked number one out of 26 companies in the Aerospace-Defense Equipment category.

Over the last four years, PCP has returned an average of 60.2%. This impressive trend is looking to continue as PCP has climbed over 55% year-to-date and is trading against record highs. In support of renewed momentum, the MACD line made a convincing cross above the signal line on Jul 2:

Precision Castparts (PCP) makes metal components and products used in aircraft engines, industrial turbine engines, airframes, medical prostheses, and other industrial applications. If you're looking for the next big thing of the information age, this is not the stock for you. Investors looking for a well-established yet fast-growing business, on the other hand, might find Precision Castparts of interest. In its last quarterly earnings report, the company reported a 69% increase in earnings for the latest quarter on a 62% gain in sales. At $103.88 currently, the stock is up nearly $40 since we wrote about it last July.

This is a fairly large company with sales of $4.79 billion in the past year. Precision Castparts has a market capitalization of $14.2 billion. Profits are large as well, with the company expected to deliver earnings of $4.30 per share this fiscal year ending March 30. That's a 67% increase from ! FY2006 and up from $1.82 in FY2005. The consensus is for EPS of $5.41 next year.

Those are some big numbers driven by the cyclical upturn in the aircraft industry which it serves. The aerospace industry has very long and often severe ups and downs, so when the cycle starts to turn up as they are doing now, investors find stocks like PCP very attractive as they anticipate a multi-year boom for the business. Plane makers like Boeing (BA) and Airbus have received some big orders in the past few years, igniting a fire under aviation component suppliers.

Investors started pouring into this stock in early 2003. PCP has come from the low-teens then (split-adjusted) to triple digits now. Fortunately, Precision Castparts has the numbers to back up that performance. Earnings have averaged 64% annual growth over the past five years. The stock is trading at a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 19.2 using for ward 12-month estimates.

In addition to the rebound for the commercial aerospace industry, military spending has been a source of strength for aircraft component suppliers. There is concern about the health of the U.S. airline industry, though. Most of the new plane orders have been from European and Asian carriers. The U.S. airlines are in very strained financial positions, so bankruptcies and consolidation are the order of the day rather than orders for new planes.

For the next few years, though, the business outlook for Precision Castparts looks very rosy indeed. Some analysts expect the commercial aircraft recovery to extend over the next four to five years. Annual sales for Precision Castparts are expected to swell to $5.3 billion for the fiscal year just ending and $6.2 billion next.

The company raised its dividend several times in the last two years, but it's not a high-yielder at just 0.10% currently. Income potential isn't what will draw investors to this stock, though, it's for those who are looking to the catch the powerful wave of a recovery in commercial aerospace and the big profits that a supplier like PCP can earn. This stock has already come a long way in the past few years, though, so investors should have a firm awareness of where we are in the cycle and how much of the future boom is already priced into the stock.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Invest in uranium? Not yet

34% DECLINE SINCE JULY 1
Uranium spot price could regain lost ground by year end - Haywood

Haywood Securities forecasts that, while uranium spot prices will continue to weaken “a tad more,” prices could regain much lost ground by year end.


Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Friday , 24 Aug 2007

RENO, NV -

In an analysis published Thursday, Canada's Haywood Securities predicted that, by year end, the spot market for uranium could regain some of the ground it has lost since the metal reached a high of $136 in mid-June.

Analysts J.W. Mustard and Chris Thompson said the rapid price increase from April to June was generated more by speculative discretionary buying than by a demand from utilities companies.

Currently the spot price has declined 34% to the current $90/lb level. To compound the situation, the analysts noted that "as the utilities seem to have taken a collective summer break, in conjunction with a lack of discretionary buying, the price has a clear negative trend."

"Primary supply/demand issues have not changed over the past few months, and each week brings pronouncements of renewed emphasis on nuclear capacity to solve fundamental electrical needs," according to Mustard and Thompson.

"Perhaps a key insight into longer term trends is the possible impact of the recent spot price decline on those companies either at the advanced stage of development or in feasibility. With the market valuation of individual companies dropping by 35% to 50%, those most affected may curtail some expenditures, leading to a deceleration of project development-ultimately feeding into lower than forecasted long-term growth supply," they noted. "Also some companies seeking equity and debt financing may experience pushback, again affecting their project timelines."

"This, combined with production shortfalls year over year 2005 to 2006 and forecasted for 2007, upward price pressure is likely to persist for a longer period."

Haywood's analysts forecast that "while the spot price has weakened and could weaken a tad more, by the end of the year prices could regain much of the lost ground, setting the stage for a robust 2008 and beyond. With potential brownouts in some areas like India, it is possible that near-term spot could exceed the recent highs."

Meanwhile, Haywood's research found that since July 1, uranium producers have experienced an average 22% decline in equity value, compared to a 32% decline for explorers and a 37% drop for developers.

Canadian uranium miners Cameco (TSX: CCO) and Denison Mines (TSX: DML) have sold off 28% and 33% during the same time period, according to the analysts. Best performing producers during the period were France's Areva SA and Uranium One (TSX: SXR).

The analysts noted that "exploration companies, which participated the most in the upside caused by the rapid uranium price escalation, have corrected the sharpest in recent months. Share price performance within the exploration sector showed weakness even before the uranium spot price topped out at US$136/lb U3O8.

Now's no time to jump into uranium stocks. Here's a look at the fundamentals and why I'd wait for an opening later in the year.

By Jim Jubak

When speculative bulls collide with speculative bears, investors stand a good chance of getting crushed.

I think that's what's happening in the market for uranium stocks right now. On the hype, a big uranium stock such as Cameco soared 38% from Dec. 29 to June 15, and a more-speculative uranium miner such as First Uranium (FURAF) rocketed ahead by 81% from Jan. 10, its first day of trading, to May 22.

But recently, the bears have counterattacked. As of Aug. 15, Cameco had fallen 33% from its high, and First Uranium had fallen 34%.

I like to stand back in a battle like this to avoid being painfully trampled by one side or the other. And then when both are exhausted, I like to step in and buy on the fundamentals, maybe even at a bargain price. I think we'll get the opportunity to do that in uranium stocks later this year.

In the meantime, we've got some time to brush up on the fundamentals of the case.
Why nuclear is coming back

The bulls began running with what's being called the renaissance of nuclear power. Because of soaring prices for fossil fuels and calls for an immediate reduction in carbon emissions to fight global warming, the world is building nuclear power plants again:

  • In August 2005, Finland began construction on the first nuclear plant to be built in Europe since 1991.
  • China has started construction on four nuclear plants, begun planning on 23 others and announced proposals for 54 more.
  • Globally, as of May 2007, 30 nuclear plants are under construction, an additional 70 are planned and 150 more are proposed.
  • Even the United States is edging into the game. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted two early site permits to U.S. utilities, and it looks like the Tennessee Valley Authority will complete its Watts Bar Unit 2, which was 80% finished when construction was halted in 1985, and become the first to bring new nuclear generating capacity on line in the United States.
Uranium bulls said, "Do the math." The world's 437 nuclear power reactors use about 67,000 metric tons of uranium each year. Uranium mines produced only 42,000 metric tons of uranium in 2005, with the rest of global demand being met from utility stockpiles or from decommissioned nuclear weapons.

Add the 30 plants under construction to the total, a 7% increase, immediately, and then add 220 not too far down the road, for a total increase of 250 reactors, or 57%, and even with the increased fuel efficiency of new reactors, you're looking at a huge shortfall in uranium production.

The shortfall gets even bigger when you take into account the projected decline in the amount of uranium available from decommissioned nuclear weapons over the next 20 years.
Frustration in Finland

No wonder that the price of uranium for immediate delivery -- the spot price -- had doubled in the 12 months that ended in July 2006 and doubled again, to $136 a pound, by late June 2007.

Or that uranium stock prices soared with it.

And then the bears bit back. Using, specifically, the horror stories surrounding the construction of the Olkiluoto 3 reactor in Finland, the very reactor that started the bulls running when it was first announced.

Construction of the reactor hasn't gone smoothly. Areva and Siemens , the French and German companies building the reactor, have had to reforge legs of the reactor and pieces of the pressure vessel. Substandard concrete has been ripped out and replaced. It's turned out to be harder to manufacture the structural steel plates for the reactor than expected.
How much demand for uranium?

As a result, the Olkiluoto 3 reactor, originally scheduled to start producing power in May 2009, is now projected to come on line a year and a half late, in December 2010. It's also going to be significantly more expensive to build than the $4.1 billion originally budgeted.

The extra time is crippling to projections for higher uranium prices, the bears have argued.

The case for higher uranium prices isn't nearly as straightforward as the bulls would have it. Higher prices for uranium will bring more uranium exploration, more uranium mining and more uranium supply. The effect of this new supply means that higher uranium prices depend on timing. If the addition of new supply lags the addition of new demand from new reactors, then the price of uranium will climb. If, however, the new supply comes on line before the new reactors do, then the price will tumble.

Cameco, a Canadian company that produces 20% of the world's uranium, projects a net increase of 77 nuclear reactors globally from 2006 to 2016 -- a much more conservative total than many bullish investors use. In the company's opinion, that will result in an increase in uranium demand of about 2% to 3% a year.
Plenty of uranium

In the long term, the world has plenty of uranium to meet that added demand -- and then some.

The world has about 4.7 million metric tons of identified uranium resources, according to International Atomic Energy Agency. In addition, there are another 10 million metric tons of more speculative resources and 22 million metric tons of unconventional resources. This entire total, 600 years of supply, can be profitably mined when uranium prices are at June's spot price of $130 a pound.

The international agency projects that production will increase by 60% from 2005 to 2010 if prices hold near $130 a pound. That's roughly a 10%-a-year increase in supply.

Of course, the bears say, if demand is rising at 3% a year and supply at 10% a year, the price of uranium won't stay at $130 a pound and some of that supply won't come on line. So far, it looks like the bears are right, as uranium prices have fallen in the past two months to about $105 per pound.
Peaks and valleys in uranium prices

The bullish argument for substantially higher prices from the peak at $136 a pound, the bears argue, works only if there's a temporary lack of uranium supply caused by a lag in getting new mines into production.

If you agree with the bearish argument, however, you get a very different scenario for uranium prices. To a bear, $136 marks a peak, and we're looking at a descent from here back to a sustainable price closer to $45 a pound by 2008.

Now mind you $45 a pound doesn't sound so bad, since uranium sold for $7 a pound not all that long ago. That is, until you realize that just about every analyst on or off Wall Street has a "buy" out on uranium stocks based on a continued climb in uranium prices. A new peak is priced into the current prices of these shares.

So, for example, RBC Capital Markets projects uranium prices will rise on scarce supply and robust demand to an average $120 a pound in 2007, up from $48 in 2006, and then climb to $145 in 2008 before beginning a gradual decline (as more supply comes on line) to $130 in 2009, $115 in 2010 and $100 in 2011.

Canaccord Adams sets the peak higher, at $166 in 2008, but says the drop will be steeper, too, to $81.25 in 2011.
I won't take the bulls' bet

I can find only a very few analysts who profess to anything like the bearish argument. On the other end of the spectrum, Desjardins Securities, another Canadian investment house that I'd put in the bearish camp, sees the recent decline in uranium prices continuing until prices fall to $45 a pound in 2008. Do I have to say that Desjardins finds uranium-sector big boy Cameco fully priced at current levels?

If you buy at today's prices, then, you're betting that everything the bulls are hoping for will go right and that the bears are wrong in all their doubts.

Sorry, bulls, but that's a bet I won't take. There's enough real trouble at Finland's Olkiluoto 3 reactor to put the bullish timetable for reactor startups in deep trouble.
Deeper problems

The delays at that reactor weren't caused by the bungling of some rogue bad contractor. They're symptomatic of problems in the nuclear renaissance story.

First, it's clear that the 15 years since anyone built a nuclear reactor in Europe have seen a major erosion of the engineering skills needed to build a reactor. Areva may have kept its hand in by servicing the huge fleet of operating reactors in its home country of France, but when it came to building a reactor from scratch, the company wound up working with inexperienced subcontractors in Finland because there just weren't any around with experience. And Finland is a country with four operating reactors.

The problem isn't limited to the Finnish subcontractors pouring the concrete. Areva has had trouble finding companies anywhere in the world capable of specialized work such as forging the steam generator tubes. There are only two companies in the world, one in France and one in Japan that can produce forged reactor vessels.

Second, the lack of experienced contractors and subcontractors will produce a huge bottleneck that will stretch out delivery times and drive up costs. The projected expansion of global nuclear construction capacity is staggering, from a recent five reactors a year to a projected 50 a year. This is at a time when the oil industry, the mining industry and projects for airlines, railroads and shipping companies are all drawing upon the same pool of construction engineers and limited supplies of the same raw materials.

Areva just revised the cost of its new reactor at Flamanville in France by 10% due to rising costs of raw materials. And remember, the bulk of new reactors planned for construction over the next few years is in Asian countries, such as China and India, that are building nuclear-engineering systems from scratch.
Can nuclear industry clear the hurdles?

And, third, the nuclear industry is trying to reintroduce a new generation of designs at the same time as it ramps up construction. Some of these, such as the Westinghouse reactor with its passive gravity-controlled safety systems, do seem to mark a huge advance in reactor safety. But no one has ever built one of those reactors or one of General Electric's new-generation designs.

Even the relatively conventional Areva design incorporates enough new features that Finnish regulators say that they didn't have a detailed design of the project when Finnish utility TVO signed the contract.

For the bullish case for the price of uranium mining stocks to play out from here, the nuclear industry has to cleanly clear all three of these hurdles -- and on time. I just don't see that happening, and I don't like the idea of risking my cash in these stocks priced as if it's certain that the industry will win that trifecta.

On the other hand, I certainly wouldn't mind picking up shares of Cameco and other uranium miners after the bulls and the bears exhaust themselves and leave the stocks at something like fundamental value. Somewhere around $23-$27 would be about right.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Buy tankers: EGLE & NAT

Eagle: Flying on raw materials E-mail Digg It!
Tuesday, 02 October 2007

 “Booming raw material consumption in China and India are boosting shipping costs and benefiting Eagle Bulk Shipping (NASDAQ: EGLE),” says Larry Edelson in Real Wealth.

“A recent quote from Bloomberg sums it up: ‘Dry bulk is on fire. If you put a dry-bulk tanker away (on contract) for three years, you get 20% returns. For crude it's 12%,’ said Omar Nokta of investment banking firm Dahlman Rose & Co.

“The rising cost of hauling bulk commodities such as coal, grain, fertilizer and iron ore is great news for your shares of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (EGLE), which are posting 65% gains. Also boosting shopping costs are bottlenecks at key ports around the globe.

“I first recommended EGLE last November, and this latest news is very bullish. What's more, the consensus estimate for the company's third-quarter earnings per share is currently 38 cents -- 52% higher than the same quarter last year. For the full-year, earnings are estimated to clock in at $1.35 per share.

“I wouldn't be surprised to see these estimates bumped higher in the coming weeks, and I wouldn't be surprised to see EGLE beat the estimates, sending these shares even higher.

“Plus, let's not forget that EGLE pays out a nice quarterly dividend. The last dividend (47 cents) was paid out on August 7. It equals a 7.6% yield. Not bad!


Despite strong gains in recent months, natural resources advisor Larry Edelson continues to recommend Eagle Bulk Shipping (NASDAQ: EGLE) and Nordic American Tanker (NYSE: NAT) in his Real Wealth Report.

While Eagle Bulk is up 44% since his initial buy in November, he says, "There's plenty more potential packed into this trade." During the first quarter, he notes, the company agreed to acquire three Supramax vessels. And, he adds, the firm has expanded its building program to four new Supramax vessels.

What's more, says Edelson, EGLE just paid out a 50 cent quarterly dividend (equal to a 9.16% yield). He states, "With red-hot demand in Asia for just about every commodity under the sun, EGLE's fleet is likely to stay booked, and profits should rise. That's great news for shareholders."

Along with Eagle, the advisor also likes Nordic American Tanker, another tanker company that has risen 26% over the past six months ago. NAT charters its fleet of Suezmax oil tankers, he notes, and will continue to benefit from "the world's insatiable appetite for the oil."

He adds that Nordic American also also pays out a "sweet," quarterly dividend equivalent to a 12.76% yield. If not on board either of these positions, he says, buy them now at the market.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

CB Richard Ellis Group (CBG) Tops Q2 EPS by 15c, Guides Higher for FY

Street Socks Stock Of CB Richard Ellis
By DANIEL MILLER - 9/17/2007
Los Angeles Business Journal Staff

To get a sense of just how nervous real estate investors are, consider CB Richard Ellis Group Inc.


The world’s largest real estate services firm not only soundly beat Wall Street expectations with its second quarter earnings but doubled its 2007 guidance.


But all that apparently amounts to little. Investors have punished the stock, which is off nearly 40 percent in the last two months.


Though the El Segundo company is highly diversified, at its core it’s a commercial brokerage, and the fear these days – justified or not – is that the commercial real estate sector won’t escape the larger market downturn spurred by the collapse of subprime lending and the stagnant housing market.


“I think what has taken place with the residential side and the subprime has impacted the sentiment of lenders on the commercial side – but there really is limited linkage between residential and commercial space,” said Chief Financial Officer Ken Kay.


Limited or not, over the past two weeks at least three analysts have downgraded the company and shares have continued sliding, closing at $25.52 on Sept. 13. As recently as July 19 the shares reached a high of $41.57.


Though a majority of analysts covering the firm still rate it a buy, the most recent hit came early last week when Goldman Sachs analyst Jonathan Habermann downgraded the company – along with two real estate investment trusts – from “buy” to “neutral.”


Even as he wrote that “growth prospects for the company’s leading global platform remain positive,” Habermann concluded that the tightening of credit terms would likely reduce the company’s volume of sales transactions.


Though the company does everything from managing property, to investing in real estate, to developing projects, commissions on brokered commercial real estate sales generated 31 percent of second quarter revenue.


“We believe that the shares could continue to be choppy in the near term,” wrote Habermann, who expects the company to see a 15 percent decline in investment sales revenue next year.


Big acquisition

Kay maintains that the fears are overblown, and the debt market – where mortgages are securitized and resold – is not as volatile in commercial real estate as it is on the residential side.


“There is still a lot of active trading taking place in the marketplace. There are still traditional players that are still participating,” Kay said, even though he acknowledged “the cost of leveraging is a bit higher or transactions take longer.”


Will Marks, an analyst for JMP Securities LLC, said that he agrees that the commercial market will not experience much more than a short-term decline once initial fears over a wider real estate meltdown subside.


“There is too much money chasing commercial real estate for transaction levels to not pick up – perhaps not to first-half 2007 levels but to still strong levels,” said Marks, who rates the company a “strong buy.”


Though rents are starting to relax in some markets, occupancy rates are high nationwide and there remains a strong demand for space. Moreover, the company, which has expanded into international markets, is seeing a boost from overseas business.


In the second quarter that ended June 30, CB Richard Ellis saw revenue rise more than 70 percent to $331 million in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and nearly 40 percent to $122 million in the Asia Pacific region. But the company may not be geographically diversified enough.


JP Morgan analyst Michael Fox, who reiterated his “overweight” rating on the company in his last research note, acknowledged that a risk for investors was its continued relatively high exposure in the high-priced New York and California real estate markets “Leaving it vulnerable to the local economic and political conditions.”


Another big issue for the company is its $2.2 billion acquisition of Trammell Crow Co. in December. The acquisition boosted the company’s property management and development arms, but some question whether the costs of paying off the transaction will slow long-term growth.


“As a company continues to grow, there are things that can slow it down,” said Michael Arnold, a managing principal at Newmark Knight Frank, the largest privately held real estate company in the world. Arnold spent about five years as a commercial broker with CB Richard Ellis Group in the 1990s.


Moving forward

However, Kay called the acquisition of Trammell Crow “very opportune” for the company with a “tremendous amount of benefits.”


“It affords us a tremendous amount of revenue-generating sources going forward,” he said.


Indeed, in the second quarter, the Trammel Crow unit accounted for a majority of the company’s revenue growth in the United States and other parts of the Americas.


“CB is generating so much cash flow it will pay off the debt associated with that transaction very quickly. I have no doubt about that transaction,” Marks said.


Habermann outlines a scenario in which the credit markets deteriorate further, depressing the commercial real estate market for a prolonged period. However, Habermann believes that a “middle of the road” situation is more likely.


For this to occur, the Fed would have to keep interest rates low, something that last week appeared more likely as fears of a recession grew on bad jobs reports and other news.


Kay agreed that interest rates will be critical in determining commercial real estate deal volume, a major revenue driver for the company.


“Only time will tell,” he said. “It is a function of what the Fed does and perception in the marketplace. Generally the fundamentals in the marketplace are still pretty solid. The underlying economy, growth in jobs and fundamentals supporting the capital markets are very sound.”


CB Richard Ellis Group
Fastest-growing rank: 33
Get quote: CBG
3-year average annual return:
79%

These days, CB Richard Ellis must feel a bit like Yahoo during the dot-com crash: Sure, Pets.com's stock was due for a collapse, they must have thought, but why do we have to suffer too? So it goes for CBRE.

Never mind that it isn't involved in subprime mortgages. The company provides a wide array of commercial real estate services, such as selling, leasing, and managing properties. Still, CBRE has seen its stock sink 33% from its 52-week high, giving investors the chance to buy shares at a discount: They're trading at just 11 times projected 2008 earnings, about 35% cheaper than the 17 P/E that the company has maintained since going public in 2004 - this for an outfit that expects a 50% earnings-per-share rise in 2007.

CBRE might seem like an unusual candidate for FORTUNE's list of quick-sprouting companies. It's more than a century old, and it's not in some trendy line of business. But it has posted a dazzling 370% total return since its IPO, even after its recent drop. Two successful acquisitions in four years, plus double-digit organic growth for 19 consecutive quarters, have turned it into the industry's largest player, with $4 billion in revenues and a global footprint.

With the debt markets tightening, CBRE's growth won't be as feverish as in the recent past - but it should be strong. Property sales, which make up about 30% of revenues, are slated to increase 6% next year. Deals are still getting done, and bullish analysts point to institutional investors' persistent appetite for commercial real estate as a key driver. Will Marks, an analyst with JMP Securities, projects the stock will reach $48 in the next 12 months. Moreover, the company's leasing division, which makes up another third of its revenues, may pick up some of the slack.

Over time, CBRE's stock price should shed the subprime-mortgage stigma and regain its luster. Says J.P. Morgan analyst Michael Fox, who thinks shares will reach $46 within a year: "There has definitely been indiscriminate selling because it's being lumped in with everything 'real estate.' "
NEW YORK -7 September

Shares of CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. tumbled Friday, with a Lehman Brothers analyst lowering his price target as subprime mortgage fears and credit quality concerns continue to weigh on the sector.

Shares of the commercial real estate services company dropped $2.51, or 9.1 percent, to $25.14 in morning trading. The stock, which has traded between $22.73 and $42.74 over the past 52 weeks, is off 17 percent for the year to date.

Jeffrey Kessler said in a client note that talks with old and new investors have shown that caution remains on companies associated with real estate. While investors acknowledge current conditions are different from the slowdown that occurred from 2000 to 2002, economic uncertainty is leaving many jittery on what they're willing to pay for real estate stocks.

These investor concerns are likely to spill over into the second half of the year, leading Kessler to lower his 2007 and 2008 earnings estimates. He trimmed his 2007 forecast by 5 cents to $2.25 per share and reduced his 2008 estimate by 10 cents to $2.75 per share.

Kessler said that he did not make a deeper 2008 cut because he remains confident in potential upside from the Trammell Crow acquisition and international growth opportunities.

Kessler also cut his price target on CB Richard Ellis by $10 to $37

3-year average annual return: 79%

These days, CB Richard Ellis must feel a bit like Yahoo during the dot-com crash: Sure, Pets.com's stock was due for a collapse, they must have thought, but why do we have to suffer too? So it goes for CBRE.

Never mind that it isn't involved in subprime mortgages. The company provides a wide array of commercial real estate services, such as selling, leasing, and managing properties. Still, CBRE has seen its stock sink 33% from its 52-week high, giving investors the chance to buy shares at a discount: They're trading at just 11 times projected 2008 earnings, about 35% cheaper than the 17 P/E that the company has maintained since going public in 2004 - this for an outfit that expects a 50% earnings-per-share rise in 2007.

CBRE might seem like an unusual candidate for FORTUNE's list of quick-sprouting companies. It's more than a century old, and it's not in some trendy line of business. But it has posted a dazzling 370% total return since its IPO, even after its recent drop. Two successful acquisitions in four years, plus double-digit organic growth for 19 consecutive quarters, have turned it into the industry's largest player, with $4 billion in revenues and a global footprint.

With the debt markets tightening, CBRE's growth won't be as feverish as in the recent past - but it should be strong. Property sales, which make up about 30% of revenues, are slated to increase 6% next year. Deals are still getting done, and bullish analysts point to institutional investors' persistent appetite for commercial real estate as a key driver. Will Marks, an analyst with JMP Securities, projects the stock will reach $48 in the next 12 months. Moreover, the company's leasing division, which makes up another third of its revenues, may pick up some of the slack.

Over time, CBRE's stock price should shed the subprime-mortgage stigma and regain its luster. Says J.P. Morgan analyst Michael Fox, who thinks shares will reach $46 within a year: "There has definitely been indiscriminate selling because it's being lumped in with everything 'real estate.' "

CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (NYSE: CBG) reports Q2 EPS of $0.66 (Excluding one-time charges) vs. consensus of $0.41. Revenues were Excluding one-time charges $1.5 billion vs. $1.35 billion consensus.

(diluted earnings per share increased 118.5% to $0.59 compared to the second quarter of 2006. Excluding one-time charges(1), second quarter 2007 diluted earnings per share was $0.66, representing an increase of 94.1% from the second quarter of 2006)

The Company is increasing its full year guidance for 2007. CB Richard Ellis expects to generate full year diluted earnings per share growth of approximately 50%, excluding one-time charges, as compared to 2006 performance. This raised guidance was based upon the strength of our first half performance and it takes into account that a portion of the gains from the Global Investment Management business were expected later in the year, a lower tax provision rate, and our outlook for the balance of the year. This will be discussed further during our conference call.


NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Shares of CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. slipped Friday after an analyst cut his price target on the real estate services company.

JMP Securities LLC analyst William C. Marks said he still rates CB Richard Ellis a "Strong Buy" and expects the company to earn $2.75 per share next year. Analysts polled by Thomson Financial expect the company to earn $2.66 per share.

Marks cut his price target to $42 from $48.

One of the measures investors use to determine what a stock should be worth is the price-to-earnings ratio, or the relation of a stock price to the company's profit. Even though Marks expects CB Richard Ellis' profit to remain intact, he expects the stock's P/E ratio to contract, leading to a lower stock price.

Marks said investors will be unwilling to pay as much for a company earning the same profit because the profit carries more risk. CB Richard Ellis faces greater risk because of its exposure to U.S. commercial property markets, which could suffer if there's a recession.

Shares of CB Richard Ellis fell 64 cents, or 2.5 percent, to $24.88 in afternoon trading.

Cameco: A 'Stealth' uranium stock

Cameco reversing the trend

World's biggest listed uranium miner reverses stock price underperformance, leaving rivals far behind.

Author: Barry Sergeant
Posted: Thursday , 13 Sep 2007

JOHANNESBURG -

Cameco (CCO.T, C$45.08 a share), by far the most heavily capitalized of listed uranium stocks, has reversed months of underperformance amid a hemorrhaging mining sub sector, currently off by an average of nearly 50% from highs. Cameco's stock price is now only a quarter off its highs, not least on the news of a share repurchase of up to 5% of its outstanding common shares. This would cost around C$750m at prevailing stock prices.

Cameco has long taken a sanguine, if not cynical, view on the dot.com-type rush that investors make into the "uranium" name in the last while. By the same token, Cameco has fully resisted the merger and takeover mania that enveloped the sector over the past six months in particular, with some deals now looking to have been made at sickly rich levels.

Cameco CEO Gerald Grandey told Bloomberg in January that "it made absolutely no sense for Cameco to pay inflated market caps for junior mining companies that are out there with uranium in their title". Instead, Cameco expects to increase production using joint ventures with smaller explorers rather than by acquiring competitors. Cameco has spent ``a few million dollars", in the words of Grandey, buying stakes of 10% to 20% of ``five or six" uranium explorers in the past year.

Cameco also recently announced an update on countering flooding conditions at its key prospect, Cigar Lake, the world's largest untapped uranium deposit. Pouring cement and injecting grout to block water entry has commenced and is expected to take another six to ten weeks to complete. The effectiveness of the plug will only be known when actual dewatering is underway. The next steps of the remediation will include verification that the inflow is sufficiently sealed. Meanwhile, Port Hope production, affected by a leak, remains suspended but Cameco has indicated sufficient stocks to meet deliveries until the end of the first quarter of calendar 2008.

Cameco's stock is back in favour among analysts. RBC Capital Markets sees "excellent upside potential from current price levels", with a price target of C$63 a share. The series of negative events and announcements beginning in July 2007, combined with the correction in spot uranium prices, have resulted in Cameco's stock surrendering all of its price gains of the past 20 months. On the bright side, RBCCM analysts see Cameco's realized prices and earnings increasing strongly over the next five years. Other analysts, such as those at UBS, are also bullish on Cameco, with a stock price target of C$60 a share.

7 September

Shares of Cameco Corp. (CCJ) offer "excellent upside potential from current price levels," according to RBC Capital Markets analyst Fraser Phillips. But, he still cut his price target on the stock.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Metals: Supercycle prompts Citigroup to raise copper price forecasts

Base metals equities correction presents 'strong buying opportunity'

CIBC analysts recently forecast that base metals prices will remain high despite the current credit crunch, while the correction of equity prices “represents a strong buying opportunity.”
Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Wednesday , 29 Aug 2007

RENO, NV -

In a recently published industry update, CIBC World Markets suggested that base metals prices should stay high despite current investor fears of slower economic growth.

Meanwhile, CIBC declared that "the recent correction in base metals equity prices represents a strong buying opportunity. With an average pullback of around 30%, most equities are trading at a discount to our long-term NAV estimates."

CIBC analysts Cliff Hale-Sanders and Terry K.H. Tsui said, "The primary question facing investors in the base metals sector is whether the current credit crunch in the U.S. capital markets will result in a lowering of the overall global economy, pushing the metals markets into surplus and re-basing commodity prices."

As problems in the housing and sub-prime mortgage markets have spread, investors are much more fearful of risk, and worry that these issues could result in a modest reduction in global growth rates, which could return commodities to a surplus, bringing the recent bull run to an end, they suggested.

"If metals prices remain robust, as we believe, valuations for base metals equities look very attractive at current levels and we would look to add positions in this environment," Hale-Sanders and Tsui said. "We view this correction as another bump in the road (maybe bigger than one would like) and a buying opportunity."

The analysts noted that the "spectacular bull run in metals prices" has not only been driven by strong base metals fundamentals, "but also by rampant speculation caused by excessive liquidity and leverage within the capital markets as investors tried to take advantage of tight market conditions. With this environment now possibly set to change, there has been a significant unwinding of positions."

Despite the current market turmoil, the analysts said they believed metals prices will remain "well above historical averages until at least 2009 as metals supply growth remains restricted during this period, barring a collapse in demand. Inventories are also expected to remain near historical lows, which should support high metals prices given the potential for ongoing supply disruption."

Nevertheless, CIBC isn't as bullish about "the potential absolute level of metals prices." In the analysts' opinion, "it is hard to envisage a fundamental need for metals prices to move materially higher on an average annual basis to entice new supply."

"If one assumes, as we do, that global demand is positioned to remain positive, albeit at slightly lower growth rates than in previous years, then the global mining industry is likely to continue to struggle to develop new sources of metal supply to catch up to demand despite record-high prices," according to Hale-Sanders and Tsui. "As such, this price cycle appears to have more legs than previous cycles."

CIBC asserts that the mining industry "is well behind in terms of adding new supply and, therefore, we are unlikely to see the traditional boom-and-bust price cycle in the mining sector. ...This, of course, assumes demand remains strong. If demand levels wane, new supply may not be required."

Current metals prices are providing mining companies "significant and abnormally high profit margins from which to grow their businesses and prices remain more than high enough to act as an incentive for new entrants," CIBC noted.

"While it is next to impossible to say if prices have already peaked or are just pausing on their long-term uptrend," the analysts said, "we are confident that prices are set to remain well above historic averages and should result in a sustained period of profitability for the mining sector."

"This period of sustained robust cash flows, combined with low multiples being ascribed to the sector, leads us to believe the stocks are positioned to be re-rated in the market in the next 12 to 24 months."

"In summary, we view the outlook for metals demand as remaining health for the next several years, barring a global recession, which would curtail demand and, in doing so, impact supply-side constraints," the analysts concluded.

So far unscathed, are commodities next to fall?

Globe and Mail Update

A funny thing has happened on the way out of risky, volatile, speculative investments. Commodities have gotten off virtually unscathed. So far.

The benchmark for global commodity performance, the Reuters/Jefferies-CRB Index, closed at 320.18 yesterday, down a modest 1.8 per cent from its recent highs of two weeks ago, which coincided with the peaks in the equity markets. It is actually up almost 1 per cent since the equity selloff began in earnest last week.

Commodities are benefiting from the fact that the financial market tumult has not, to date, been an economic story. The economic fundamentals underpinning demand for raw materials and fuels remain relatively solid, especially outside the United States, while supplies of many commodities remain tight. That continues to lend support to commodity prices even as financial markets attempt to adjust for a non-economic threat, namely growing credit risks.

"Fundamentals do matter. It's really that simple," said Bart Melek, global commodity strategist at BMO Nesbitt Burns.

Of course, those credit risks do have the potential to spread to the broader economy, slowing spending and demand in a wide range of areas. But while equity investors seem nervous about such a possibility, commodity traders, it would seem, are a more confident breed.

Front and centre among those bold commodity players are the speculators - in other words, the hedge funds. That's right, the same hedge funds that are being severely rattled by the prospect of tightening credit conditions, since much of their investing binge in the past few years has been financed with low-cost debt.

The hedge fund speculators had been piling back into commodities in the past few weeks, according to commodity futures market data from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Speculative long positions in oil and copper were at record highs last week, while gold speculative longs had risen to two-month highs.

Have the credit-risk-fuelled market jitters changed that? We'll get a much better idea today, when the CFTC releases fresh weekly data on traders' long and short positions. Analysts believe the hedgies have begun unwinding some of their bloated speculative long positions, but so far they have been selective and measured, going after commodities where they can liquidate the easiest and realize the best profits.

That may be why gold, for example, retreated almost $25 (U.S.) last week. Copper has also been in retreat, not surprising given that the yen carry trade - a key pillar in the global liquidity flood that markets fear is beginning to dry up - has been a major financing tool for speculative purchases of copper and other base metals.

There could be a lot more downside where that came from. Richard Bernstein, chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch in New York, estimates that speculation accounts for more than 30 per cent of the current price built into market-traded commodities. If the credit crunch deepens, and heavily leveraged hedge-fund speculators are forced to liquidate assets to meet their obligations and financing needs, that's a lot of fat that could melt away from commodities.

"Short-term investors in other overvalued speculative assets, like commodities and emerging markets, should learn from the current mishaps in the debt markets. Supposedly liquid securities can rapidly become illiquid," Mr. Bernstein warned in a note to clients this week.

Martin King, oil commodity analyst at FirstEnergy Capital Corp. in Calgary, said oil could be in for an unwinding of speculative long positions anyway, in the wake of a sharp runup in fund buying since the end of May. He said crude prices could easily pull back $10 (U.S.) a barrel in the next two months on "normal seasonal unwinding." He suggested that additional selling linked to the credit market fears might deepen that correction to $15.

Which is not to say that the bull market for commodities is on its deathbed; the fundamentals are too strong for that. Still, a deepening credit crunch could well spell the end to the rampant speculation in commodities that has proven so profitable for hedge funds and, indeed, the broader investment community.

"True long-term investors should continue restructuring portfolios to accentuate undervalued higher-quality assets at the expense of speculative lower-quality assets," Mr. Bernstein said. "The liquidity driven, speculative tone to the financial markets the past five years is unlikely to be the tone of the next five years."



FREEPORT, BARRICK, NEWMONT WILL BENEFIT

Citigroup analysts on two continents hiked copper price forecasts Monday, asserting that “nowhere are the drivers and determinants of the commodity supercycle more clearly on display than in copper.”

Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Tuesday , 24 Jul 2007

RENO, NV -

Highlighting a "super cycle shining on copper," Citigroup Global Markets metals analysts Monday revised their copper forecasts up to $3.50/lb in 2008 and $3/lb in 2009/2010.

The long-term copper price assumption was increased by 32% to $1.45/lb.

Based on their Australian counterparts' recent in-depth analyst of the copper supercycle released Monday, Citigroup metals analysts John H. Hill and Graham Wark of San Francisco and Sydney's Alan Heap hiked the target price for copper-gold producer Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) to $120/sh. The analysts also raised EPS estimates for mega-gold miners Barrick (AFX) and Newmont (NEM), based in large part on their copper operations.

In their report, "Copper-A Super Cycle Sheen," Citigroup Sydney, Australia-based Research Analysts Heap and Alex Tonks proposed that "the copper market is enjoying a repeat of its performance in the supercycles of 50 and 100 years ago. Demand is strong and supply is struggling to keep up. Structural change is underway in consequence."

The analysts defined a commodity super cycle as an extended period (10-plus years) of trend rise in price, "driven by a major economy as it urbanizes and industrializes." During the past 150 years, Citigroup indicated that there have been two previous commodity super cycles.

"We believe three factors will support high long-run returns: strong demand growth; a steep cost curve; and high barriers to entry," Heap and Tonks declared. "There is no shortage of large copper deposits, but they tend to be in regions of high political risk, and are low grade, thus increasing barriers to entry."

Citigroup asserts that the copper market will be close to supply demand balance until 2010. Meanwhile, they also forecast that copper prices will soften in the second half of this year "as the end of restocking by Chinese fabricators impacts the market, and strike concerns abate."

Nevertheless, the analysts also suggested that a steeper cost curve to produce copper, increasing barriers to entry and strong demand growth "will support higher returns in the future." In the meantime, sustainable high copper prices "can be expected to attract new market entrants," they advised. "The Chinese are the most notable, driven by strong domestic demand, a shortage of domestic resources and a smelter industry which is short of supply."

SUPPLY/DEMAND BALANCE

Nonetheless, Citigroup's analysis suggested that the intensity of Chinese copper use may be peaking. "High production composition of income (i.e. an economy driven by manufacturing and exports, rather than the consumer and services) in China is the driver of the super cycle," the analysts put forward. "However, material composition of product is lower now: less copper is used in many applications than in the past. ...In China electricity intensity may be reaching a higher plateau."

Heap and Tonks advocated that "lower than expected supply has been the most important factor supporting [copper] prices above forecast levels. It remains a key uncertainty, both in the short and long term. Short term concerns center on the impacts of possible strikes. Long term issues center on the timing of new supply."

"We now expect persistent tightness in the copper market through 2009," the analysts advised. "From 2010 the market moves into surplus as supply increases to meet continuing strong demand growth. The smelter bottleneck also eases, allowing smelter utilization rates to recover."

"Our central forecast points to an excess in mine supply from 2012. In the forecast this is reflected in a build up of concentrate stocks, as there is unlikely to be sufficient smelter capacity to process the concentrate. If sufficient smelter capacity does become available surpluses would be expected to build in the metal market."

A higher proportion of new copper supply is expected to come from high political risk regions, including Central Africa, which Citigroup advises will add at least 10% of new supply "and potentially much more." Despite the risk, "large mining companies are increasingly comfortable operating in such regions however, relying on technology and surveillance to ensure the safety of personnel," the analysts indicated.

Citigroup advises that Chile will continue to dominate copper mine supply, but that Central Africa "is potentially a center of much greater future growth."

Citigroup was adamant in its assertion that "there is no shortage of large copper deposits," citing a recent Brook Hunt study identifying more than 100 projects with measured and indicated resources of more then 200Mt of copper at 0.68% Cu, equating to 25 years of supply. Of the 100 projects, 30 have more than 2Mt contained copper.

In its analysis, Citigroup projected costs forward to 2014, forecasting that the industry average cash cost of production will be 80-cents per pound.

Citigroup also forecasts "extreme tightness in the concentrate market continuing until the next decade as a consequence of modest growth in concentrate supply and increasing smelter capacity. TC/RCs will remain under pressure. ...Looking further forward, the market will ease after 2010 as concentrate supply increases, and assuming no new smelters are built beyond those already committed."

The analysts proposed that two critical issues will shape the copper demand outlook in the short and medium term: the Chinese inventory cycle and the U.S. economy." They suggested that U.S. demand may be bottoming even though housing is in a downturn and auto sector demand is also weak.

"Overall our demand forecast is for growth to average 5.1% year until 2010," Citigroup said.

U.S.-based Citigroup analysts Hill and Wark said, "We are re-setting copper forecasts significantly higher across the board to levels broadly in-line with the future curve and well above forecasts embedded in consensus earnings for the mining companies. "

"It is becoming clear to us that the legacy of a decade of under-advancement, frictional barriers to new capacity, and voracious demand in both developing and established economies have overwhelmed supply, while frustrating prophesies of imminent cycle surplus," they declared.

"We expect copper supply/demand to remain very tight and see little chance that inventories can be meaningfully rebuilt before 2010," they wrote. "Fundamental drives we point to include: 1) A higher/steeper cost curve; 2) Resource nationalism restricting access; 3) Increasing difficulty in permitting; 4) Shortages of equipment and technical staff; and 5) Falling ore grades and resource depletion."

Despite the declining Chinese intensity cited by their Australian counterparts, Hill and Wark advised that they expect Chinese demand will average 12% per year, and global trend growth will increase from 2.5% to 4.5%."

COPPER FORECASTS BENEFIT GOLD MINERS

Citigroup's analysis suggests that high copper price forecasts benefit gold mines, such as Barrick and Newmont, "who each have significant exposure. We continue to be ardent believers in gold, based on a mix of supply/demand and macro/monetary drivers. ...Our sense is that as investors query, ‘What's big, important, and profitable in metals, and where the shares haven't run?', the answer will be ‘gold.'"

Noting that the Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold model is "heavily leveraged to copper" and commodity forecasts above $3/lb have had profound effects, the analysts said, "We are raising EPS estimates by 80-100% in 2008/09." Citigroup lowered target multiples for the New Orleans based mega-miner, but are taking the FCX target to $120/share.

Meanwhile, the analysts suggested that the "aggressive valuation and commodity framework employed by Rio Tinto in its friendly bid for Alcan, casts Freeport in a favorable light. This is particularly true from the margin and relative resources scarcity perspective. While it seems premature for Freeport to be ‘back in play,' there might eventually be a good fit with CVRD or others."

Citigroup also hiked its EPS estimate for Barrick, particularly highlighting the "unsung yet highly profitable" Zaldivar copper mine in China. "With the global re-rating of the hard rock miners, Barrick's non-gold assets are increasingly attractive," the analysts said. "Also, gold has shrugged off the central bank sales and assorted pessimists, to regain the $670/oz level, while gold equity multiple compression appears to have run its course."

Finally, Citigroup also slightly raised EPS estimates on Newmont to reflect the impact of higher copper prices at the Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia. "This is offset by expectations for a flower ramp-up at the ‘new' Phoenix mine in NV. Material cashflows are unlikely before the PRB-fired power plant can supply cheaper electricity (-50%) in mid-2008."


Base Metals 2007 - Learning to live with volatility

Even such a short period as the past quarter has seen some remarkable changes in base metals prices – both up and down.

Author: Natixis Commodity Markets
Posted: Wednesday , 01 Aug 2007

LONDON -

Since Natixis Commodity Markets' previous quarterly report, there have been some incredible changes in base metal prices. No common theme really emerged in this period and the performance of nickel and lead stand out. The nickel price in late July is around 35% below the all-time high of $54,200/tonne set on May 16, while lead prices are now 120% above the low for the year. Supply disruptions have been the key driver behind lead's amazing performance so far this year. Lower supply and increased investment fund activity have also supported tin's recent advance, and the rebound in copper prices. Zinc prices have come under pressure despite LME inventories continuing to trend lower, while the aluminium market remains well supplied and prices have traded in a narrow range.

Global base metals demand remains "out of sync"

The de-synchronisation of the demand cycle has been a feature of the metals market for sometime. It is a positive feature, as we are not seeing the sharp reductions in global demand as consumption dips temporarily in many of the key consuming regions. For example, so far in 2007, the markets have generally taken in their stride the weakness in US demand, as consumption has been strong in Europe. This de-synchronisation of demand within Japan, North America and Europe is also taking place against the background of robust metals-intensive growth in China and India - a trend that certainly looks set to continue.

Substitution - mainly an issue for the nickel market

The lack of detailed end-use data for the base metals markets means it is difficult to quantify some of the substitution pressures. For most of the base metals, substitution has not been a major factor, with the exception of nickel, and to a lesser extent, copper. For nickel, the massive increase in prices is passed on directly - through the alloy surcharge system - to the consumer of stainless steel. As we have noted in our earlier reports, nickel's use by the stainless steel industry is being affected in two ways - the greater level of ferritic production (which contains no nickel), and in the emerging markets higher 200 series (which contains less nickel than the 300 series).

The alloy surcharge system also adds to the volatility in orders for stainless. Following the recent sharp correction in the nickel prices, alloy surcharges will fall dramatically. Therefore consumers and service centres are reluctant to place orders in the knowledge that stainless prices are falling.

Substitution in the copper market has been focused on plumbing, heat exchanger and wiring applications. For zinc, pressures have emerged in the brass and die-casting sectors, while aluminium has probably benefited from substitution at the expense of copper and tinplate.

Supply tightness is still a feature for most of the base metals

The supply side has been a key factor behind the bull market. The combination of structural tightness due to low levels of investment earlier in the decade, technical problems associated with high utilisation rates and increased labour disputes, have all constrained supply. The low level of treatment charges for lead and copper suggest that supply tightness is still an issue. For most of the metals, the pipeline of new projects is not that threatening in terms of additional supply. Zinc is at the other extreme, as a supply response to the period of high prices is starting to emerge.

Buffer stocks remain low

The recent trends in the lead market highlight the low level of buffer stocks. All the markets are still vulnerable to unexpected supply losses (or sudden surges in demand). The supply disruptions in Australia and lower exports from China quickly filtered through to the lead market, while strikes continue to support the copper price.

The economic environment is favourable for this stage of the price cycle

Typically high commodity prices are associated with extreme inflationary pressures, rising interest rates and the potential for a sharp contraction in the level of economic activity. Natixis Commodity Markets believes that the economic climate is exceptionally benign.

Aluminium

Aluminium prices have been remarkably stable in recent months. There is nothing in the current fundamentals to suggest that prices should move drastically away from their current range (either to the upside or the downside) in the summer months. Natixis Commodity Markets project a relatively balanced market this year, compared to last year's 357,000 tonne deficit, we predict 50,000 tonnes for 2007. However, given the strength in non-Western World consumption, we forecast the deficit increasing once more in 2008 to 250,000 tonnes.

The main bullish argument appears to be that the metals' underperformance could attract fund interest. However more likely in our view is for prices to drift lower due to seasonal factors. With inventories unlikely to approach the critical levels seen elsewhere in the sector, Natixis Commodity Markets projects an average annual price average of $2,750/tonne for 2007, dropping to $2,300/tonne in 2008.

Copper

A number of different and conflicting themes are affecting the copper market. Essentially they can be summarised as the demand side being weak and the supply side being bullish. Since April, these factors largely cancelled each other out with monthly average prices remaining in a $7,475-8,000/tonne range. The supply tightness is partly a function of strikes, but also due to a shortfall in concentrate output (reflected by low TCs). While the former may be temporary, the latter will take some time to work through the system.

Demand conditions have been weak all year in the US, while in China demand (imports of cathode) has eased reflecting the over-buying earlier in the year. Consumption is weakening in Europe but that is mainly for seasonal reasons. We believe demand will pick up but that it will be matched by higher supply. Given strike action we have raised our 2007 price forecast to $6,750/tonne from our earlier estimate of $6,350/tonne. In line with this we have also raised our 2008 forecast price to $5,750/tonne from $5,000 in our previous report. In terms of the supply-demand balance, we project a 50,000 tonne surplus in 2007 moving to a 160,000 tonne surplus in 2008.

Lead

The lead market has tightened considerably since our previous report as the production problems at the concentrate stage begin to bite. More recently the market appears to being supported by the imposition of an export tax by the Chinese government. Despite the amazing surge in lead prices, Natixis Commodity Markets has only made slight changes to the supply-demand balance. We have scaled back our estimates of Western World refined output due to the tight concentrate position. We have also reduced our projections of refined net exports from China. Lower supply is partially offset by weaker than expected consumption. The bottom line is that we are forecasting a 60,000 tonne deficit compared to our previous estimate of a 35,000 tonne shortfall. For 2008 we still have the lead market in a modest surplus.

We have, however, significantly raised our prices. Natixis Commodity Markets is now forecasting an average lead cash price of $2,400/tonne. We still view a lead cash price of over $3,000/tonne as ultimately unsustainable and project an average cash price of $1,900/tonne in 2008.

Nickel

We forecast a marginal surplus of 5,000 tonnes, on the back of a 0.9% rise in Western World usage counterbalanced by a 5.0% rise in supply. For 2008, we see this surplus expanding slightly to 15,000 tonnes with supply growth at 4.7% compared to 4.0% for demand. The increase in LME inventories so far in 2007 (in volume terms) has been quite small given the cuts in stainless output and the greater availability of scrap. This raises the question of whether off warrant stocks have been built up. From a fundamental standpoint, this suggests scope for further price weakness. As such, Natixis Commodity Markets projects an average annual price of $37,000/tonne in 2007, which should then fall to $27,000/tonne in 2008.

Tin

On the basis of lower than expected demand growth we have amended our supply-demand balance analysis to show a 2,000 tonne deficit compared to our previous estimate of an 18,000 tonne shortfall. LME stocks in late July, at around 13,000 tonnes, are largely unchanged from the beginning of the year. LME stocks dipped in the early part of the year when the disruption to Indonesian output was at its most extreme. Since then they have increased by around 5,000 tonnes. We expect that the increase in stocks will level off in the latter part of the year as demand starts to pick up after a relatively weak start to the year. In 2008, the market is forecast to show a slight surplus of 8,000 tonnes. This should lead to an average annual price of $11,000/tonne in 2008 compared to this year's projected outturn of $13,750/tonne.

Zinc

In the short-term there is the potential for zinc prices to rally in response to the on-going reduction in LME inventories. However, we would view such a move as temporary, with two key features during the remainder of the year likely to help bring prices lower. These will be an increase to Chinese exports of refined zinc and a sharp rise in mine production globally. For 2007 we project a price average of $3,500/tonne, and $2,900/tonne in 2008 as the market moves into a surplus of 125,000 tonnes next year.


Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Freeport McMoran FCX

S&P gives Freeport-McMoRan ‘positive’ credit rating, despite $9.7b debt

S&P has revised the outlook for Freeport-McMoRan upward, noting robust commodity prices, vast reserves, diversified production, and a good project pipeline will reduce corporate debt by $1.8 billion this year.

Author: Dorothy Kosich
Posted: Wednesday , 18 Jul 2007

RENO, NV -

Citing expectations that Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold will be able to reduce its $9.7 billion debt, Standard & Poor's this week revised its outlook for Freeport and its Phelps Dodge acquisition from "stable" to "positive," affirming all corporate credit ratings.

Primary Credit Analyst Thomas Watters said, "The outlook revision reflects our expectations that Freeport-McMoRan should also be able to reduce its borrowing, specifically the $2.45 billion under its term loan A facility, in a reasonable time frame to warrant an upgrade of the corporate credit rating to investment grade."

"The ratings on Freeport reflect its leading position in copper mining, its significant and diverse reserve base, its very-low cost Indonesian operations, strong liquidity, and currently favorable metals prices," Watters wrote. "The ratings also reflect very aggressive debt leverage, exposure to cyclical and volatile commodity prices, rising costs, challenges faced at its mature, U.S.-based operations, and exposure to the political and sovereign risks of Indonesia."

Watters noted that Freeport should benefits from Phelps Dodge's "good production pipeline potential-specifically, the low-cost Tenke Fungurame project in the Congo, which, is however, exposed to that country's political risk." Nevertheless, he also expressed some discomfort at Freeport's exposure to Indonesia's operating risks through its gigantic Grasberg copper-gold operation, accounting for 38% of Freeport's revenues, 35% of equity production, and 40% of pro forma EBITDA.

"Moreover, while we deem Phelps to be a very good mining operator, " Watters said, "Phelps' U.S. based-operations are mature and relatively high-cost compared to other mining operations, This is primarily of lower ore grades and exposure to U.S. labor, environmental compliance, and energy costs, which are higher than for international mining operations. The company has relied on strict adherence to reducing costs throughout its system while advancing new, lower-cost, and more efficient mining techniques."

While S&P feels Freeport's credit metrics are healthy, they also asserted that it reflects "peak copper, gold, and molybdenum prices and does not indicate our expectations for credit metrics in the future. Despite the considerable paydown of debt, we view the capital structure as aggressive. Nevertheless, Freeport should achieve a more conservative balance sheet based on our outlook for copper, gold and molybdenum prices for the next four to five quarters."

S&P forecast that Freeport will generate a discretionary cash flow of $1.8 billion this year, thanks to robust commodity markets, which will reduce overall debt to $7 billion-$7.2 billion.



In a presentation to the JPMorgan Basics & Industrial Conference Monday, Freeport President and CEO Richard Adkerson said the company expects to have operating cash flows of $5.3 billion this year and year-end total debt of $9 billion. Its mines will produce 3.9 billion pounds of copper, 1.9 million ounces of gold, and 70 million pounds of molybdenum this year, according to Adkerson.

Freeport's PD division is developing the $650 million Tenke Fungurume copper/cobalt project in the DRC, which is anticipated to yield 259 million pounds of copper and 18 million pounds of cobalt in its first decade. Adkerson also gave a project update for the DOZ Expansions in Indonesia including mine development activities at the Grasberg Block Cave during the second half of this year.



Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold tripled its Q2 net earnings from a year ago on higher metal prices and the $26 billion buyout of copper miner Phelps Dodge, but EPS of $2.62 fell short of the $2.74 analysts were forecasting. FCX 25 07 2007 EarningsChartNet income rose over 200% to $1.1 billion, while revenue climbed 307% to $5.33 billion. "Our second-quarter financial performance reflects strong results in our North American, South American and Indonesian operations, and a continuation of positive market conditions for copper, gold and molybdenum. The outlook for our business is strong," the company said in its press release. Shares are up 70.5% YTD in apparent appreciation of the acquisition, which made FCX the world's number-two copper company. In a July 6 note, Credit Suisse wrote, "Comparing FCX’s copper, molybdenum, and gold reserves with current North American equity market valuations for the reserves of ‘pure play’ copper, molybdenum, and gold producers suggests FCX shares ($95) are worth $126 per share." Shares are trading slightly higher in the pre-market. Check for Freeport-McMoRan's earnings call transcript later today.



James Cullen submits: Freeport McMoRan: Cheap Producer, Cheap Stock I recently completed my research into Freeport McMoRan (FCX), which acquired Phelps Dodge to become the largest publicly traded copper company in the world. There is much to be interested in here, as the new Freeport now has geographic diversity, excellent reserves, additional promising projects, and exposure to molybdenum.

Here are a few main points to consider:

  • The Freeport/Phelps Dodge combo trades at a trailing pro forma 4.6x EV/EBITDA. Compare this with other major miners like Southern Copper (PCU) at 6.8x EV/EBITDA, Rio Tinto (RTP) at 7.4x EV/EBITDA, Barrick Gold (ABX) at 10.6 EV/EBITDA, and Newmont Mining (NEM) at 10x EV/EBITDA.
  • Copper market fundamentals remain positive for Freeport, as supply and demand remain in a very tight balance. Further, a lack of major capacity additions coupled with continued growing demand from China and an eventual uptick in housing starts in America will further add to the demand side. The potential for supply disruptions – as seen with Southern Copper’s miners going on strike in Peru last week – remains a very real threat, as warehouse supplies of copper are also near record lows.
  • Much of the additional supply that is seen coming to the copper markets in the next few years will be sourced from Freeport’s mines; this should give the company better control over industry-wide production practices, and hence price. With the majority of mines in the latter stages of life and estimated to be depleted by 2021, Freeport is in excellent positioning with its reserve quality and life, as its projects will have a great role in swaying global supply.
  • This might sound a bit scary, but Freeport does not hedge its production. The company is levered to copper prices, with each $0.10 change in copper resulting in a change of $250M in Operating Cash Flow or $0.75 in EPS. Gold and molybdenum prices both have an impact, although to a much lesser extent. Freeport’s management has a great degree of experience and a reputation for being the lowest cost producer, and their stance on hedging is obviously indicative of a belief that copper prices won’t significantly retreat any time soon. At current prices, Freeport should be able to generate well over $6 billion in Operating Cash Flow.
  • Using a quick cash flow valuation, I believe FCX is worth north of $85/share. While there might be some uncertainty surrounding this stock given that the latest quarter only including marginal production from Phelps Dodge, I think that next quarter’s fully integrated results will handily beat expectations and send the stock much higher, but make sure to watch the cash, as the accrual results are going to be impacted by accounting items from the deal.